✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

AMRITA SINHA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Mr. Kamlesh Jha, Ms. Srabani Biswas. …For the Petitioners. Mr. Aloke Kumar Ghosh, Mr. Mihir Kundu. …For KMC. Mr. Sudipto Panda, Ms. Munmun Tewary. …For the State. Mr. Ranajit Jaiswal. …For the Private Respondents. Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today is taken on record. The petitioners are aggrieved by the notice issued under Section 401 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 on 22nd February, 2022. By the said notice, the petitioners have been directed to stop forthwith all construction work including addition and alteration at the Premises No. 12D, Radha Kanta Jew Street, Ward No. 12, Kolkata- 700004 as the same was being carried on without any sanction. 2 Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that no construction work is being carried out by the petitioners. Learned advocate appearing for the private respondents at whose instance the aforesaid notice was issued, complains that the petitioners were trying to construct staircase from the ground floor to the first floor of the said premises without obtaining any sanction. As it appears that a stop work notice has been issued and the petitioners submit that they are not making any construction work, accordingly, the Sub- Assistant Engineer (Civil), Building, the respondent no.2 herein is directed to cause an inspection of the property in question upon giving prior notice to the petitioners as well as the representatives of the private respondents and to ascertain as to whether any unauthorized construction work has been made at the instance of the petitioners. In the event it appears that there is any unauthorized construction made by the petitioners, necessary steps shall be taken by the aforesaid respondent to deal with the same in accordance with law. If it ultimately transpires that there is no unauthorized construction as complained, then the aforesaid respondent shall take steps to recall the notice under Section 401 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. The writ petition stands disposed of. 3 Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities. ( Amrita Sinha, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 — s. 401.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments