✦ Calcutta High Court

JURISDICTION Ct.No.34 dc. C.R.R. 739 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) Saugata Das & Ors. v. Preeti Das In Re: An Application under Section 482 of the Code

C.R. CASE No. 103 of 2015TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

Case at a glance

Bench
TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

Provisions considered

Judgment

The contentions advanced in this revisional application are series of cases which are pending between the parties and those cases which have been disposed of. The grievance of the petitioners is that the present opposite party is filing one after another case and as such, the present case has been initiated with an ulterior motive and the same should be quashed. The grounds on which the complaint case under Sections 498A/500/34 of the Indian Penal Code has sought to be quashed are not on the foundation of any legal bar or a factual foundation which debars the complainant to initiate a proceeding. The contentions/allegations made in the petition of complaint, prima facie, make out an offence in respect of 2 the sections for which it has been instituted and as such, this Court is of the considered view that no interference is called for. Accordingly, the revisional application being CRR 739 of 2020 is dismissed. Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated. All pending connected applications, if any, are consequently disposed of. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. C.R. CASE No. 103 of 2015). ← Search more judgments