Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Allen Felix … for the Petitioner(s) Ms. Sipra Mazumdar Ms. Somashree Dey … for the State-respondent(s) The petitioners pray for quashing of the proceedings on the ground that a criminal case is continuing for 20 years. Since, an alternative remedy is available under Section 529 of the BNSS (earlier under Section 483 of the Cr.P.C.), I am of the view that the petitioners would avail their remedies before the court having determination. Accordingly, WPA 4828 of 2025 is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to approach the court having determination. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.