Misc. Case No. 45 of 2008 · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
Provisions considered
Judgment
order in absence of the parties. In this revision petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 9th November, 2009 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandannagar, Hooghly in Misc. Case No. 45 of 2008 under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C.. The petitioner is thus aggrieved by the Court’s order directing the present opposite party to pay a sum of Rs.4000/- per month as maintenance by the present opposite party. On perusal of the grounds stated by the petitioner those are found not to be sufficient and convincing enough to satisfy this Court to interfere into the impugned order passed by the Court below as challenged in this revision petition. On the finding as above, I am inclined to dismiss the revision case being CRR 434 of 2010. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Connected application, if any, stands adjudicated with the case. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for. (Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.