Aloke v. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 23 Mar 2008
Outcome
Disposed of
diary, the Criminal Revision is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 147, 148, 353, 379
- Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 ss. 3, 4
- Arms Act, 1959 ss. 25, 27
- Indian Explosive Substances Act
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharyya Mr. Sourav Chatterjee … for the petitioners Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee, ld. PP Ms. Faria Hossain Ms. Rita Datta … for the State The present revision has been preferred praying for quashing of proceeding being G.R. No. 302 of 2018 pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalyani, Nadia, arising out Kalyani Police Station Case No. 85 of 2008 dated 23.03.2008 under Sections 147/148/353/379 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. Learned Public Prosecutor is present with the case diary and has filed the memo of evidence. The charge-sheet in the present case has been submitted for offence punishable under Sections 147/148/353/379 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. Initially, the present case had been started also under Section 25 and 27 of the Arms Act and 9(b) of the Indian Explosive Substances Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be granted leave to agitate all the points raised by him in this revision before the learned Trial Court. 2 Considering the said submission and the nature of offence alleged and also the materials on record in the case diary, the Criminal Revision is disposed of. The petitioners are at liberty to agitate all the points raised herein before the learned Trial Court. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: diary, the Criminal Revision is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 147, 148, 353, 379; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 — ss. 3, 4; Arms Act, 1959 — ss. 25, 27; Indian Explosive Substances Act.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Calcutta High Court, on 23 Mar 2008.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.