✦ Calcutta High Court · 22 Jan 2025

AB Ct. no.2 v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.

ANIRUDDHA ROY3 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
22 Jan 2025
Bench
ANIRUDDHA ROY

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Manas Kumar Das, learned counsel appears for the petitioners. Mr. Chandi Charan De, learned Additional Government Pleader appears for the respondents. The petitioners seek permission to use a government land which is immediately adjacent to their dwelling place. Petitioners referring to the representation dated January 22, 2025, annexure P-5 at page 37 to the writ petition submits that the same is still pending. After considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties and upon perusal of the materials on record, this Court is also of the view that, Section 8 of the West Bengal Highways Act, 1964, inter alia, provides for submission of an application in writing by an intending user of a portion of the public road, if he/she is found to be eligible strictly in accordance with law. 2 In view of the above, the petitioners shall be at liberty to submit necessary application strictly accordance with Section 8 of the said 1964 Act before the jurisdictional Assistant Engineer, P.W.D. within a period of two weeks from date.

In the event, such an application is submitted by the petitioners, the jurisdictional Assistant Engineer, P.W.D. upon issuing a prior hearing notice to the petitioners and after granting them an opportunity of hearing shall dispose of such application by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The entire exercise shall be carried out and completed by the jurisdictional Assistant Engineer, P.W.D. positively within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving application from the petitioners along with a copy of today’s order and the reasoned order shall be communicated to the petitioners within a period of one week from the date of the said reasoned order to be passed. It is made clear that, while considering the application the Assistant Engineer must satisfy itself by recording his satisfaction that the smooth movement through the road shall not be hindered in any manner, if such permission is accorded the petitioners.

Additionally the Assistant Engineer shall also take into consideration all the relevant provisions of the 1964 Act applicable in this case. 3 It is made clear that this order shall not create any right or equity in favour of the petitioners, if the petitioners do not succeed to their claims strictly in accordance with law. In the event, the reasoned order goes in favour of the petitioners, the appropriate authority shall take all necessary and consequential steps to give an immediate effect thereto but subject to obtaining a valid and lawful undertaking from the petitioners that whenever the petitioners will be required to vacate the land by the P.W.D. authority, the petitioners shall vacate the same unconditionally within 72 working hours from the written communication to be received by the petitioners from the P.W.D. authority to such effect. In such event, the petitioners shall not claim any right or equity.

Since affidavits are not called for, the allegations made in this writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents. With the above observations and directions this writ petition, WPA 4111 of 2025 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished expeditiously. (Aniruddha Roy, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

West Bengal Highways Act, 1964 — s. 8.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Calcutta High Court, on 22 Jan 2025. The bench was ANIRUDDHA ROY.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments