✦ Calcutta High Court

2277..0044..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 3581 of 2026 Pulak Sarkar v. The State of West Bengal Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das Mr. Dipendu Sarkar & Ors.

SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Case at a glance

Bench
SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Outcome

Disposed of

Writ petition stands disposed of

Judgment

Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das Mr. Dipendu Sarkar …for the petitioner Mr. Samrat Choudhury Ms. Maitrayee Das …for the respondents nos. 6 & 7 Mr. Tanmoy Kumar Ghosh Mr. Souvava Basu …for the State

1.

In terms of the order dated 1st April, 2026 matter is taken up for consideration when learned advocate representing the State respondents has filed a communication of Inspector-in-Charge, Chakdaha Police Station and same is taken on record.

2.

It is disclosed in the communication which is filed today that pursuant to the order dated 1st April, 2026 concerned police authority took steps which facilitated the petitioner and his wife to stay at their own residence. Learned advocate representing State respondents has submitted that police protection is provided to the petitioner which would further enable the petitioner and his wife to stay at their 2 premises. Concerned police authorities are directed to provide such police assistance for 4 (four) weeks from date.

3.

Within the aforesaid period of 4 (four) weeks petitioner shall be at liberty to approach jurisdictional authority under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act,

Operative part

4.

Writ petition stands disposed of.

5.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments