Judgment · High Court

Mr. Kaushik Choudhury Ms. Busra Khatun Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Ld. APP Ms. Debjani Dasgupta …for the petitioner. …for the State. Police apparently rely upon statement of a Pradhan of a Gram Panchayat claiming that the petitioner is involved in the incident, apart from statement of the co-accused. Gram Panchayat Pradhan did not witness the incident. Therefore, police are proceeding on the basis of the statement of the co-accused made while in custody. Police filed charge sheet. In such circumstances, we are of the view that the petitioner is able to overcome the restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985. Consequently, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the 2 petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. C.R.M. (A) 489 of 2024 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)