BAZAR WOMEN P.S. CASE No. 15 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 161, 438
- Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ss. 3, 4
Judgment
Mr. Mounick Ghosh Mr. B. K. Roy Mr. Mirza Firoj Ahmed Begg … for the petitioner. …for the State. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the other co-accuseds were granted anticipatory bail. He highlights the delay in the lodgment of the First Information Report. Learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that the petitioner is the husband of the victim. He refers to the statement recorded under Section 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the victim. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 903 of 2022, is rejected. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.) 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.