Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction CRR 280 of 2021 Ankita Mitra @ Rakshit & Anr. State of West Bengal & Anr. -versus- Mr. Rakesh Singh Ms. Trishani Sarkar …..for the petitioners. Mr. Abir Chakraborty Mr. Sayantan Sinha ……for the O. P. No.2. Mr. Madhusudan Sur, ld. APP, Mr. Dipankar Paramanick …for the State. Learned advocates for the petitioner, opposite party no. 2 as well as the State is present. Mr. Sur, learned advocate appearing for the State submits a report of SI of Police, Belghoria PS, B.K.P.C. The report reflects that final report has been submitted before the jurisdictional court. In view of the contentions advanced in the report, it reflects that there is no scope for collection of further evidence as the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C was filed before the jurisdictional court. Having regard to the contentions advanced in the report by the Investigating Officer of Belghoria Police Station Case No. 527 of 2020 dated 14.10.2020, I am of the view that the revisional 2 application has become infructuous. With the aforesaid observations, the present revisional application being CRR 280 of 2021 is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, are consequently disposed of. All concerned parties are to act in terms of a copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. [Tirthankar Ghosh, J]
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.