Misc. Appeal No. 40 of 1999 · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SIDDHARTHA ROY CHOWDHURY
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Rabindra Nath Mahato Mr. Aritra Shankar Roy Heard Mr. Mahato, learned counsel for the petitioner. This revisional application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenges the Order No. 31 dated 18th January, 2003 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fourth Court at Midnapore in Misc. Appeal No. 40 of 1999 arising out of Title Suit No. 43 of 1999. By the impugned order, the learned Appellate Court impliedly refused to extend the order of interim injunction passed on 18th May, 1999. It is submitted that subsequently the injunction application was disposed of with certain direction upon learned trial court and upon the parties expeditious disposal of the suit and till then, the order of injunction to continue till disposal of the suit. Thus, this revisional application has lost its relevance and is disposed of being “infructuous”. 2 The photocopy of the order passed in Misc. Appeal No. 40 of 1999 is taken on record. (Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.