NAIHATI GRPS CASE No. 38 of 2013 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 302, 307, 326
- Arms Act, 1959 ss. 25, 27
Judgment
Mr. Arunava Ganguly Mr. M Sur Ms. Purnima Ghosh …… for the petitioner …… for the State
Petitioner was on bail earlier. He misused his liberty and absconded. Thereafter he was rearrested. Offences if proved would attract mandatory life imprisonment.
In view of the gravity of the offence and as there are every likelihood that the petitioner if on bail may again abscond, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
Accordingly, prayer for bail is rejected.
Trial court is requested to expedite the trial and conclude the same at an early date. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.