FARUK MOLLA & Ors. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL IA NO & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUJOY PAUL, SMITA DAS
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. With the aforesaid, PIL is disposed of.
Judgment
Mr. Pankaj Halder Ms. S. Banerjee ..for the Petitioners. Mr. Jahar Lal De ..for the State. Mr. Lakshminath Bhattacharyya ..for the Respondent Nos.9 and 10. Sk. Rejaul Alam ..for Proposed Addition of Party.
With the consent, finally heard.
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties reached to a consensus.
It is agreed that during the pendency, Memo No.280/LR/SDO/DH/23 dated 03.08.2023 is issued by Sub-Divisional Officer, Diamond Harbour, South 24-Parganas to concerned Block Land & Land Reforms Officer, Mathurapur-I Block, South 24- Parganas and, therefore, the said authority may be directed to take the proceeding to a logical end expeditiously (if not already concluded).
In view of consensus arrived at, this PIL is disposed of by directing the concerned Sub- Divisional Officer to conclude the proceedings by 2 permitting the private respondent to participate in the same pursuant to the said letter dated
03.08.2023 expeditiously preferably within three months (if not already concluded).
With the aforesaid, PIL is disposed of.
The question of maintainability of PIL in a matter of this nature will remain to be decided in appropriate case.
It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits. ( SUJOY PAUL, J. )
( SMITA DAS DE, J. )
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.