N) POLICE STATION CASE No. 145 of 2023 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 164, 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 408
Judgment
Mr. Pawan Kr. Gupra, Ms. Sofia Nesar, Mr. Santanu Sett, Mr. Biswajit Mal, Advocates … … For the Petitioner Mr. Suman De, Advocate … …For the State Police called upon the petitioner as an witness to record a statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which the petitioner did. In such circumstances, we do not find the present application to be maintainable. In such circumstances, CRM (A) 271 of 2024 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. N) POLICE STATION CASE No. 145 of 2023).
← Search more judgments