✦ Calcutta High Court

Ct No v. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.

AMRITA SINHA

Case at a glance

Bench
AMRITA SINHA

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Mr. Sounak Bhattacharya, Mr. Tirthankar Mukherjee, Mr. Debjit Mukheerjee, Ms. Susmita Chatterjee, Mr. Susanta Pal, Ms. Ananya Neogi, … For the Petitioner. … For the K.M.C. … For the State. The petitioner is suffering an order of demolition which is to be implemented on 28th February, 2023. The learned advocate for the petitioner contends that his client intends to prefer appeal against the order of demolition but for want of the certified copy of the said order, the appeal cannot be preferred. It was submitted by the learned advocate for the Corporation that the petitioner did not deposit the fees for obtaining the certified copy, and accordingly, the same could not be delivered. The fees payable for issuing the certified copy is Rs. 1,000/- as it appears from the rates, taxes, fees and charges for the year 2022–23 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that his 2 client has visited the concerned office today for collecting the certified copy. It will be open for the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned order of demolition and seek necessary relief from the appellate forum. For the ends of justice, the Executive Engineer (Civil)/Building Department Borough-III is restrained from giving any effect and/or further effect to the notice dated 15th February, 2023 issued under Sections 544 and 546 of the KMC Act 1980 till 24th March, 2023 or until further order, whichever is earlier. It is made clear that in the event the petitioner fails to obtain any order of stay of the order of demolition from the appellate forum within the aforesaid time period, it will be open for the said Engineer to proceed with the demolition work. The writ petition stands disposed of. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties or their advocates on record expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities. ( Amrita Sinha, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments