C.R.M.(DB) No. 163 of 2024 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Mostafijur Rahman ….for the petitioner Mr. Sudip Ghosh Ms. Sima Biswas …… for the State
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits no legally admissible evidence has come on record. Accordingly, he prays for bail.
Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits trial is in progress.
We have considered the materials on record. Trial is in progress. There are evidence connecting the petitioner with the murder. Under such circumstances, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
The application for bail is, thus, rejected. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.