✦ Calcutta High Court

January 19 v. West Bengal Highway Development

SUVRA GHOSH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Sk. Rejaul Alam, Ms. Anupama Yasmin, Mr. Chandi Charan De, Mr. Anirban Sarkar, …for the petitioner. …for the State. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that he is a raiyat in respect of the plot in question and has been possessing the same. Notice under Section 10(1) of the West Bengal Highways Act, 1964 was issued upon him on September 27, 2021 by the Project Director (V), WBHDCL directing him to remove unauthorised construction on the said plot. The petitioner complains that the plot in question belongs to him and the question of any unauthorised construction on the said plot does not arise. The petitioner submitted a representation to that effect before the authority on 9th November, 2021 which is yet to be disposed of. The petitioner prays for a direction upon the authority to consider the said representation at the earliest. Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and material on record, the writ 2 petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 9th November, 2021 within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the interested parties including the petitioner, in accordance with law. Pending disposal of the representation, let there be an order of stay of the notice dated September 27

2021. WPA 713 of 2022 is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to be admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties on usual undertakings. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

West Bengal Highways Act, 1964 — s. 10(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments