Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ss. 21(c), 29
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. We have considered the materials on record. Bail prayer of the petitioner was rejected on merits in February, 2023. Thereafter trial has commenced. Under such circumstances, we are of the opinion this is not a fit case to grant bail to the petitioner.
Judgment
Mr. Pravas Bhattacharya Mr. Arup Sarkar … … for the State
1.
Heard the learned Advocates appearing for both the parties.
2.
We have considered the materials on record. Bail prayer of the petitioner was rejected on merits in February, 2023. Thereafter trial has commenced. Under such circumstances, we are of the opinion this is not a fit case to grant bail to the petitioner.
3.
The application for bail is thus rejected. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. KALIACHAK POLICE STATION CASE No. 466 of 2022).
← Search more judgments