Vageesh Pati Tripathi v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another

2.Heard Mr. G.C. Verma, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. Vinay Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Anand Dubey, Advocate who has filed counter affidavit along with the vakalatnama for the respondent No.2 which are taken on record, and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

3.It is alleged in the prosecution case that the complainant Byakul Kishor Misra, who is Manager of Shri Ganesh Sanskrit Uchchtar Madhyamik Vidyalaya has alleged that the Principal Vedpati without informing him and the Committee of Management as well as office bearers while forging his signature and members of the Committee of Management and preparing forged documents has passed proposal for appointment of his son Vageesh Pati Tripathi, present applicant whose educational qualification is M.A.B.Ed, Sanskrit, Navya Vyakaran whereas the post is of Sanskrit Sahitya. It is further alleged that Vidyapati Tripathi has been working since 2021 on contract basis in the said subject, i.e. Navya Vyakaran. It is further alleged that the letter of appointment has been issued on the basis of Government Order dated 21.4.1998 whereas presently the appointment is being done under 2009 Regulations. 2 NABAIL No. 1948 of 2025

4.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that regarding appointment of the applicant, one Bhagwati Pujan Tiwari has made a complaint to the District Inspector of Schools who after hearing the respective parties has passed a detailed order dated 6.6.2025 placed on record at Annexure No.18 to the bail application. This order deals with the issue involved in the present first information report such as forgery etc regarding appointment of the applicant. It is submitted that the order dated 6.6.2025 (supra) has been stayed by a coordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 17/22.9.2025 passed in writ C No.8852 of 2025 (Annexure-25). It is submitted that the allegation in the prosecution case is that irregular appointment of the applicant has been made. Regarding that, an order has already been passed by the District inspector of Schools which has been stayed by a coordinate Bench of this court, referred to above. He further submits that the applicant has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned Addl. Government Advocate and complainant's counsel have opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. It is submitted on behalf of the complainant that while filing bail application, the applicant has concealed his criminal antecedent which has been stated by him in para 20 of the counter affidavit filed today which is taken on record. It is next submitted that the allegation in the prosecution case is of forging the signature of the Manager and other members of the Committee of Management. It is further submitted that the Writ C No.8852(supra) was filed by the President who was not competent, as per rules, to file such petition. The application for anticipatory bail is liable to be dismissed, also for suppression of fact. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of case diary submits that in CD percha No.6, the investigating officer has recorded the statement of some members of the committee of management who have denied for any meeting having been held, and their signatures. He has supported the contention of complainant's counsel that a first information report No.57 of 2025 under sections 117(2)/351(3)/115(2)/352 BNS, P.S. Kauriya, district Gonda is registered against the applicant. However, he could not state as to whether any notice or summon has been issued to the applicant 3 NABAIL No. 1948 of 2025 or he has any knowledge of the said case.

6.As regards criminal history of the applicant as mentioned in para 20 of the counter affidavit, the applicant's counsel submits that he has no knowledge of any such criminal case nor he has received any notice or summon.

7.I have considered the submission and perused the record. The trial court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application has recorded the following observation(s) "अिभयोजन (cid:352)प(cid:347)(cid:523) के अवलोकन से (cid:293)प(cid:504) है िक बावी मुकदमा (cid:497)ारा (cid:352)थम सूचना िरपोट(cid:259) म(cid:517) अिभयु(cid:472) व सहअिभयु(cid:472) को नामजद िकया गया है। के स डायरी व अिभयोजन (cid:352)प(cid:347)ो के अवलोकन से (cid:293)प(cid:504) है िक (cid:352)करण म(cid:517) वादी (cid:361)ी गणेश सं(cid:293)कृ त उ०मा० िव(cid:495)ालय का (cid:352)बंधक है। िजसके अनुसार घटना िदनांक 18.08.2024 की है. िव(cid:495)ालय के (cid:352)धानाचाय(cid:259) वेदपित (cid:497)ारा (cid:352)ब(cid:281)धक सिमित के पदािधकािरय(cid:523) के जाली ह(cid:293)ता(cid:87)र (cid:293)वयं बनाकर कू टरिचत द(cid:293)तावेज तैयार करके तदथ(cid:259) िनयु(cid:472) करने का (cid:352)(cid:293)ताव पािरत िकया तथा अपने पु(cid:347) बागीश पित ि(cid:347)पाठी को िजनकी शैि(cid:87)क यो(cid:264)यता (एम०ए०बी०एड०) (िवषय सं(cid:293)कृ त न(cid:498) (cid:498)ाकरण) है, (जबिक न(cid:498) (cid:498)ाकरण िवषय पर (cid:361)ी िव(cid:495)ापित ि(cid:347)पाठी संिवदा िश(cid:87)ण 2021 से काय(cid:259)रत है)

15.10.2024 को िनयुि(cid:472) प(cid:347) िनग(cid:259)त कर िदया िव(cid:495)ालय के प(cid:347)ांक 5 व 6 िदनांिकत

22.05.2025 को (cid:352)धानाचाय(cid:259) व (cid:352)ब(cid:281)धक की जानकारी के िबना (cid:497)ारा िजला िव(cid:495)ालय िनरी(cid:87)क गो(cid:276)डा से प(cid:347)ाचार म(cid:517) उ(cid:472) िनयुि(cid:472) का आधार शासनादेश िदनांक 21.04.1998 दशा(cid:259)या गया है जबिक वत(cid:259)मान म(cid:517) उ(cid:485)र (cid:352)देश सं(cid:293)कृ त मा(cid:280)यिमक िश(cid:87)ा पिरषद (सं(cid:293)थाओ के (cid:352)धान(cid:523), अ(cid:280)यापको एवं सं(cid:293)था(cid:603) के अ(cid:281)य कम(cid:259)चािरय(cid:523) की िनयुि(cid:472) एवं सेवा शत(cid:518)) िविनयमावली 2009 ही (cid:352)भावी है। इस (cid:352)कार (cid:352)धानाचाय(cid:259) (cid:497)ारा (cid:352)ब(cid:281)धक व (cid:352)ब(cid:281)धक सिमित के अ(cid:281)य पदािधकािरय(cid:523) से छल करके धोखे से उ(cid:472) फज(cid:515) िनयुि(cid:472) की है और तब से इस िनधुि(cid:472) को िछपाये रखा, हाल ही म(cid:517) िव(cid:495)ालय म(cid:517) काय(cid:259)रत अ(cid:281)यं िश(cid:87)क(cid:523) (cid:497)ारा उ(cid:472) फज(cid:515) िनयुि(cid:472) की सूचना िगली तब स(cid:286)बि(cid:281)धत अिधकािरय(cid:523) को इस स(cid:286)ब(cid:281)ध म(cid:517) सूिचत िकया गया है। अिभयु(cid:472)गण (cid:497)ारा कू टरिचत तरीके से (cid:361)ी गणेश सं(cid:293)कृ त उ०मा० सं(cid:293)कृ त िव(cid:495)ालय िपिदन कौि(cid:237)या जनपद(cid:276)डा के (cid:352)बंध सिमित के सद(cid:293)य(cid:523)/पदािधकािरय(cid:523) के जाली ह(cid:293)ता(cid:87)र बनाकर अिनुय(cid:472) वेदपित ि(cid:347)पाठी (cid:497)ारा अपने पु(cid:347) बागीश पित ि(cid:347)पाठी की तदथ(cid:259) िश(cid:87)क के पद पर िनयुि(cid:472) सीसनादेश िदनाक

21.04.1998 के अनुसार की गयी जबिक वत(cid:259)मान म(cid:517) उ(cid:485)र (cid:352)देश सं(cid:293)कृ त मा(cid:280)यिमक िश(cid:87)ा पिरषद (सं(cid:293)था(cid:603) के (cid:352)धाना(cid:280)यापको एवं सं(cid:293)था(cid:603) के अ(cid:281)य कम(cid:259)चािरय(cid:523) की िनयुि(cid:472) एवं सेवा शत(cid:518)) िविनयमावली 2009 के अनुसार (cid:352)मादी है। इस (cid:352)कार (cid:352)करण म(cid:517) किथत अिभयु(cid:472)गण (cid:497)ारा शासनादेश के िवपरीत जाकर तथा गंभीर अपराध कािरत िकया है िजससे यह (cid:293)प(cid:504) है िक 4 NABAIL No. 1948 of 2025 आवेदक/अिभयु(cid:472)गण को (cid:87)ित प(cid:631)ंचाने एवं अपमािनत करने के उ(cid:489)े(cid:291)य से अिभयोग नही लगाया गया है। बि(cid:289)क (cid:352)करण म(cid:517) अिभयु(cid:472) अ(cid:281)य सहअिभयु(cid:472) नामजद ह(cid:520)। मामले की िववेचना अभी (cid:352)चिलत है। अिभयु(cid:472)गण (cid:497)ारा अपने अि(cid:334)म जमानत (cid:352)ाथ(cid:259)ना प(cid:347) म(cid:517) जो अ(cid:281)य कथन िकए गये है उ(cid:472) पर िवचार िवचारण के दौरान िकया जायेगा। िव(cid:497)ान सहायक िजला शासकीय अिधव(cid:472)ा (फौजदारी) के अनुसार अिभयु(cid:472)गण को अि(cid:334)म जमानत िदए जाने पर उनके फरार हो जाने तथा सा(cid:296)य से छेडछा(cid:237) की स(cid:286)भावना (cid:498)(cid:472) की गयी है। इसके अितिर(cid:472) अिभयु(cid:472)गण (cid:497)ारा िववेचना म(cid:517) सहयोग न िकए जाने की आ(cid:263)या थाने से (cid:352)ा(cid:282)त कराई गई है। ऐसे म(cid:517) मामले के त(cid:278)य एवं पिरि(cid:293)थितय(cid:523) म(cid:517) अि(cid:334)म जमानत का संतोषजनक आधार नह(cid:514) है। अतः अि(cid:334)म जमानत (cid:352)ाथ(cid:259)ना प(cid:347) िनर(cid:293)त िकए जाने यो(cid:264)य है। आदेश (cid:352)ाथ(cid:515) / अिभयु(cid:472)गण वैदपित ि(cid:347)पाठी व बागीश पित ि(cid:347)पाठी (cid:497)ारा मुकदमा अपराध सं(cid:263)या- 232/2025 अ(cid:281)तग(cid:259)त धारा-319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352, 351(3) बी०एन०एस०, थाना-कौि(cid:237)या, िजला-गो(cid:276)डा के मामले म(cid:517) (cid:352)(cid:293)तुत अि(cid:334)म जमानत (cid:352)ाथ(cid:259)ना-प(cid:347) सं0-2747/2025 िनर(cid:293)त िकया जाता है।"

8.On due consideration to the submission advanced, discussion made above, observation of the trial court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application as also the statement(s) of members of the Committee of Management who have denied their signature(s) on the resolution, and the applicant seems to be the sole beneficiary, prima facie, it does not appear to be a case of false implication. The application is liable to be dismissed.

9.The application is accordingly dismissed. December 11, 2025 kkb/ (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

2.Heard Mr. G.C. Verma, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. Vinay Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Anand Dubey, Advocate who has filed counter affidavit along with the vakalatnama for the respondent No.2 which are taken on record, and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

3.It is alleged in the prosecution case that the complainant Byakul Kishor Misra, who is Manager of Shri Ganesh Sanskrit Uchchtar Madhyamik Vidyalaya has alleged that the Principal Vedpati without informing him and the Committee of Management as well as office bearers while forging his signature and members of the Committee of Management and preparing forged documents has passed proposal for appointment of his son Vageesh Pati Tripathi, present applicant whose educational qualification is M.A.B.Ed, Sanskrit, Navya Vyakaran whereas the post is of Sanskrit Sahitya. It is further alleged that Vidyapati Tripathi has been working since 2021 on contract basis in the said subject, i.e. Navya Vyakaran. It is further alleged that the letter of appointment has been issued on the basis of Government Order dated 21.4.1998 whereas presently the appointment is being done under 2009 Regulations. 2 NABAIL No. 1948 of 2025

4.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that regarding appointment of the applicant, one Bhagwati Pujan Tiwari has made a complaint to the District Inspector of Schools who after hearing the respective parties has passed a detailed order dated 6.6.2025 placed on record at Annexure No.18 to the bail application. This order deals with the issue involved in the present first information report such as forgery etc regarding appointment of the applicant. It is submitted that the order dated 6.6.2025 (supra) has been stayed by a coordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 17/22.9.2025 passed in writ C No.8852 of 2025 (Annexure-25). It is submitted that the allegation in the prosecution case is that irregular appointment of the applicant has been made. Regarding that, an order has already been passed by the District inspector of Schools which has been stayed by a coordinate Bench of this court, referred to above. He further submits that the applicant has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned Addl. Government Advocate and complainant's counsel have opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. It is submitted on behalf of the complainant that while filing bail application, the applicant has concealed his criminal antecedent which has been stated by him in para 20 of the counter affidavit filed today which is taken on record. It is next submitted that the allegation in the prosecution case is of forging the signature of the Manager and other members of the Committee of Management. It is further submitted that the Writ C No.8852(supra) was filed by the President who was not competent, as per rules, to file such petition. The application for anticipatory bail is liable to be dismissed, also for suppression of fact. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of case diary submits that in CD percha No.6, the investigating officer has recorded the statement of some members of the committee of management who have denied for any meeting having been held, and their signatures. He has supported the contention of complainant's counsel that a first information report No.57 of 2025 under sections 117(2)/351(3)/115(2)/352 BNS, P.S. Kauriya, district Gonda is registered against the applicant. However, he could not state as to whether any notice or summon has been issued to the applicant 3 NABAIL No. 1948 of 2025 or he has any knowledge of the said case.

6.As regards criminal history of the applicant as mentioned in para 20 of the counter affidavit, the applicant's counsel submits that he has no knowledge of any such criminal case nor he has received any notice or summon.

7.I have considered the submission and perused the record. The trial court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application has recorded the following observation(s) "अिभयोजन (cid:352)प(cid:347)(cid:523) के अवलोकन से (cid:293)प(cid:504) है िक बावी मुकदमा (cid:497)ारा (cid:352)थम सूचना िरपोट(cid:259) म(cid:517) अिभयु(cid:472) व सहअिभयु(cid:472) को नामजद िकया गया है। के स डायरी व अिभयोजन (cid:352)प(cid:347)ो के अवलोकन से (cid:293)प(cid:504) है िक (cid:352)करण म(cid:517) वादी (cid:361)ी गणेश सं(cid:293)कृ त उ०मा० िव(cid:495)ालय का (cid:352)बंधक है। िजसके अनुसार घटना िदनांक 18.08.2024 की है. िव(cid:495)ालय के (cid:352)धानाचाय(cid:259) वेदपित (cid:497)ारा (cid:352)ब(cid:281)धक सिमित के पदािधकािरय(cid:523) के जाली ह(cid:293)ता(cid:87)र (cid:293)वयं बनाकर कू टरिचत द(cid:293)तावेज तैयार करके तदथ(cid:259) िनयु(cid:472) करने का (cid:352)(cid:293)ताव पािरत िकया तथा अपने पु(cid:347) बागीश पित ि(cid:347)पाठी को िजनकी शैि(cid:87)क यो(cid:264)यता (एम०ए०बी०एड०) (िवषय सं(cid:293)कृ त न(cid:498) (cid:498)ाकरण) है, (जबिक न(cid:498) (cid:498)ाकरण िवषय पर (cid:361)ी िव(cid:495)ापित ि(cid:347)पाठी संिवदा िश(cid:87)ण 2021 से काय(cid:259)रत है)

15.10.2024 को िनयुि(cid:472) प(cid:347) िनग(cid:259)त कर िदया िव(cid:495)ालय के प(cid:347)ांक 5 व 6 िदनांिकत

22.05.2025 को (cid:352)धानाचाय(cid:259) व (cid:352)ब(cid:281)धक की जानकारी के िबना (cid:497)ारा िजला िव(cid:495)ालय िनरी(cid:87)क गो(cid:276)डा से प(cid:347)ाचार म(cid:517) उ(cid:472) िनयुि(cid:472) का आधार शासनादेश िदनांक 21.04.1998 दशा(cid:259)या गया है जबिक वत(cid:259)मान म(cid:517) उ(cid:485)र (cid:352)देश सं(cid:293)कृ त मा(cid:280)यिमक िश(cid:87)ा पिरषद (सं(cid:293)थाओ के (cid:352)धान(cid:523), अ(cid:280)यापको एवं सं(cid:293)था(cid:603) के अ(cid:281)य कम(cid:259)चािरय(cid:523) की िनयुि(cid:472) एवं सेवा शत(cid:518)) िविनयमावली 2009 ही (cid:352)भावी है। इस (cid:352)कार (cid:352)धानाचाय(cid:259) (cid:497)ारा (cid:352)ब(cid:281)धक व (cid:352)ब(cid:281)धक सिमित के अ(cid:281)य पदािधकािरय(cid:523) से छल करके धोखे से उ(cid:472) फज(cid:515) िनयुि(cid:472) की है और तब से इस िनधुि(cid:472) को िछपाये रखा, हाल ही म(cid:517) िव(cid:495)ालय म(cid:517) काय(cid:259)रत अ(cid:281)यं िश(cid:87)क(cid:523) (cid:497)ारा उ(cid:472) फज(cid:515) िनयुि(cid:472) की सूचना िगली तब स(cid:286)बि(cid:281)धत अिधकािरय(cid:523) को इस स(cid:286)ब(cid:281)ध म(cid:517) सूिचत िकया गया है। अिभयु(cid:472)गण (cid:497)ारा कू टरिचत तरीके से (cid:361)ी गणेश सं(cid:293)कृ त उ०मा० सं(cid:293)कृ त िव(cid:495)ालय िपिदन कौि(cid:237)या जनपद(cid:276)डा के (cid:352)बंध सिमित के सद(cid:293)य(cid:523)/पदािधकािरय(cid:523) के जाली ह(cid:293)ता(cid:87)र बनाकर अिनुय(cid:472) वेदपित ि(cid:347)पाठी (cid:497)ारा अपने पु(cid:347) बागीश पित ि(cid:347)पाठी की तदथ(cid:259) िश(cid:87)क के पद पर िनयुि(cid:472) सीसनादेश िदनाक

21.04.1998 के अनुसार की गयी जबिक वत(cid:259)मान म(cid:517) उ(cid:485)र (cid:352)देश सं(cid:293)कृ त मा(cid:280)यिमक िश(cid:87)ा पिरषद (सं(cid:293)था(cid:603) के (cid:352)धाना(cid:280)यापको एवं सं(cid:293)था(cid:603) के अ(cid:281)य कम(cid:259)चािरय(cid:523) की िनयुि(cid:472) एवं सेवा शत(cid:518)) िविनयमावली 2009 के अनुसार (cid:352)मादी है। इस (cid:352)कार (cid:352)करण म(cid:517) किथत अिभयु(cid:472)गण (cid:497)ारा शासनादेश के िवपरीत जाकर तथा गंभीर अपराध कािरत िकया है िजससे यह (cid:293)प(cid:504) है िक 4 NABAIL No. 1948 of 2025 आवेदक/अिभयु(cid:472)गण को (cid:87)ित प(cid:631)ंचाने एवं अपमािनत करने के उ(cid:489)े(cid:291)य से अिभयोग नही लगाया गया है। बि(cid:289)क (cid:352)करण म(cid:517) अिभयु(cid:472) अ(cid:281)य सहअिभयु(cid:472) नामजद ह(cid:520)। मामले की िववेचना अभी (cid:352)चिलत है। अिभयु(cid:472)गण (cid:497)ारा अपने अि(cid:334)म जमानत (cid:352)ाथ(cid:259)ना प(cid:347) म(cid:517) जो अ(cid:281)य कथन िकए गये है उ(cid:472) पर िवचार िवचारण के दौरान िकया जायेगा। िव(cid:497)ान सहायक िजला शासकीय अिधव(cid:472)ा (फौजदारी) के अनुसार अिभयु(cid:472)गण को अि(cid:334)म जमानत िदए जाने पर उनके फरार हो जाने तथा सा(cid:296)य से छेडछा(cid:237) की स(cid:286)भावना (cid:498)(cid:472) की गयी है। इसके अितिर(cid:472) अिभयु(cid:472)गण (cid:497)ारा िववेचना म(cid:517) सहयोग न िकए जाने की आ(cid:263)या थाने से (cid:352)ा(cid:282)त कराई गई है। ऐसे म(cid:517) मामले के त(cid:278)य एवं पिरि(cid:293)थितय(cid:523) म(cid:517) अि(cid:334)म जमानत का संतोषजनक आधार नह(cid:514) है। अतः अि(cid:334)म जमानत (cid:352)ाथ(cid:259)ना प(cid:347) िनर(cid:293)त िकए जाने यो(cid:264)य है। आदेश (cid:352)ाथ(cid:515) / अिभयु(cid:472)गण वैदपित ि(cid:347)पाठी व बागीश पित ि(cid:347)पाठी (cid:497)ारा मुकदमा अपराध सं(cid:263)या- 232/2025 अ(cid:281)तग(cid:259)त धारा-319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352, 351(3) बी०एन०एस०, थाना-कौि(cid:237)या, िजला-गो(cid:276)डा के मामले म(cid:517) (cid:352)(cid:293)तुत अि(cid:334)म जमानत (cid:352)ाथ(cid:259)ना-प(cid:347) सं0-2747/2025 िनर(cid:293)त िकया जाता है।"

8.On due consideration to the submission advanced, discussion made above, observation of the trial court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application as also the statement(s) of members of the Committee of Management who have denied their signature(s) on the resolution, and the applicant seems to be the sole beneficiary, prima facie, it does not appear to be a case of false implication. The application is liable to be dismissed.

9.The application is accordingly dismissed. December 11, 2025 kkb/ (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench