Harihar Kishore Pandey v. Sajal Pandey And 2 Others
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XXXIX rr. 1, 2
Judgment
3.
Considering the aforesaid prayer, it is directed that the trial court shall endeavour to decide the aforesaid pending application with all expedition, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of copy of this order.
4.
The writ petition is finally disposed of, in terms of above. Order Date :- 15.1.2025 Arun ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXXIX rr. 1, 2.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 15 Jan 2025. The bench was PANKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 6534 of 2024).
← Search more judgments