Santosh Singh and others v. Rakesh Singh) instituted under Section

case between the parties is pending before the civil court. The operative portion of the order dated 19.06.2023 reads as under. "ददोनोሪ पकोሪ कके वविदቛኋन अधधिविकቛኋ ककी बहस ससुननके कके उपरቛኋन्त पतቛኋविलली कቛኋ अविलदोकन वकयቛኋ गयቛኋ। नቛኋरली वनरलीकक थቛኋनቛኋ उमरलीबकेगमगगंज दቛኋरቛኋ ्ቚस्तसुत चቛኋलቛኋनली ररपदोरर वदनቛኋगंवकत 25.11.2022 पर सगंजቛኋन लकेकर सगं० ककी धिቛኋरቛኋ-145(1) कके तहत नदोवरस वनगरत ककी गयली हहै। वदतलीय पक रቛኋकके श धसगंह कके पक मम वनष्पቛኋवदत हቛኋमलीयतनቛኋमቛኋ कके आधिቛኋर पर भभूवम गቛኋरቛኋ सगंख्यቛኋ 378, 482 वि 373 ककी दቛኋधखिल खिቛኋररज रቛኋकके श धसगंह कके पक मम अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय दቛኋरቛኋ ककी गयली, धजसकके वविरु्ቍ ्ቚथम पक सन्तदोष धसगंह आवद कके दቛኋरቛኋ विቛኋजदቛኋयर ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ पत वदयቛኋ गयቛኋ। विቛኋजदቛኋयर ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ पत कके ्ቅम मम विसलीयतनቛኋमቛኋ कके आधिቛኋर पर पቛኋररत दቛኋधखिल खिቛኋररज कቛኋ आदकेश वदनቛኋगंक 05.10.2018 कदो आदकेश वदनቛኋगंक 17.02.2021 कके दቛኋरቛኋ स्थवगत वकयቛኋ गयቛኋ। भभूवम गቛኋरቛኋ सगंख्यቛኋ 482, 378, 373 पर ददोनोሪ पकोሪ कके मध्य कब्जकेदቛኋरली कदो लके करकके ्ቚबल शቛኋनन्त व्यविस्थቛኋ कके दृवቖኌगत ्ቚभቛኋरली वनरलीकक दቛኋरቛኋ 25.11.2022 कदो चቛኋलቛኋनली ररपदोरर ्ቚकेवषत कर अन्तगरत धिቛኋरቛኋ -146 द०्ቚ०सगं० कके तहत कቛኋयरविቛኋहली वकए जቛኋनके कके सቛኋथ ८०्ቚ०सगं० ककी धिቛኋरቛኋ -107/116 वि 116 (3) कके तहत आख्यቛኋ भली ्ቚस्तसुत ककी गयली वक सन्तदोष धसगंह आवद वि रቛኋकके श धसगंह कके मध्य जमलीनली वविविቛኋद कदो लके करकके कቛኋफकी कसलीदगली वि तनቛኋवि व्यቛኋ्቎ हहै, ददोनोሪ पकोሪ कदो भቛኋरली सके भቛኋरली जमቛኋनत वि मसुचलकके पर पቛኋविरन्द वकयቛኋ जቛኋय। भभूवम गቛኋरቛኋ सगंख्यቛኋ 378, 373 वि 482 पर कब्जकेदቛኋरली कदो लके करकके पबत शቛኋनन्त व्यविस्थቛኋ कके दृवቖኌयत ६०्ቚ०सगं० ककी धिቛኋरቛኋ-145 कके तहत कቛኋयरविቛኋहली ्ቚचधलत हहै , जहቛኋगं वदतलीय पक कቛኋ कथन हहै वक ्ቚकरण कके सम्बन्धि मम दलीविቛኋनली न्यቛኋयቛኋलय मम विቛኋद वविचቛኋरቛኋधिलीन रहतके हहए 145 द०्ቚ०सगं० ककी कቛኋयरविቛኋहली नहली ककी सकतली हहै , वकन्तसु वदतलीय पक दቛኋरቛኋ अपनके कथन कके समथरन मम मቛኋ० दलीविቛኋनली न्यቛኋयቛኋलय मम वविचቛኋरቛኋधिलीन विቛኋद ककी कदोई सቛኋቌኚय स्विरुप ्ቚवत दቛኋधखिल नहीሻ ककी गयली हहै। उपरदोक वविविकेचनቛኋ कके आधिቛኋर पर ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ पत 145 (5) द०्ቚ०सगं० वदनቛኋगंवकत 26.12.2022 पदोषणलीय न हदोनके कके कቛኋरण वनरस्त हदोनके यदोग्य हहै। आदकेश अततः तदद नसुसቛኋर ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ पत 145 (5) द०्ቚ०सगं० वदनቛኋगंवकत 26.12.2022 वनरस्त वकयቛኋ जቛኋतቛኋ हहै। ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ पत 146 (1) द०्ቚ०सगं० पर बहस हकेतसु पतቛኋविलली वदनቛኋगंक 06.07.2023 कदो पकेश हदो।"

3. The applicant has also assailed the order dated 12.12.2023 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C., Gonda (in short 'Revisional Court') in Criminal Revision No.268 of 2023 (Rakesh Singh Vs. Santosh Singh and 3 others). The relevant portion of the order reads as under. "अविलदोकन सके वविवदत हहै वक वविदቛኋन न्यቛኋयቛኋलय दቛኋरቛኋ उपरदोक ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ -पत पर उभयपकोሪ कके वविदቛኋन अधधिविकቛኋ ककी बहस ससुनकर एविगं पतቛኋविलली कቛኋ अविलदोकन करनके कके पश्चቛኋत आककेवपत आदकेश मम चቛኋलቛኋनली ररपदोरर कቛኋ उलकेखि करतके हहए एविगं अपनके आदकेश कके वनष्कषर मम यह उवलधखित करतके हहए वक - "भभूवम गቛኋरቛኋ सगंख्यቛኋ-482,378,373 पर ददोनोሪ पकोሪ कके मध्य कब्जकेदቛኋरली कदो लके करकके ्ቚबल शቛኋनन्त व्यविस्थቛኋ कके दृवቖኌगत ्ቚभቛኋरली वनरलीकक 25.11.2022 कदो चቛኋलቛኋनली ररपदोरर ्ቚकेवषत कर अन्तगरत धिቛኋरቛኋ -146 दगं०्ቚ०सगं० कके तहत कቛኋयरविቛኋहली वकयके जቛኋनके कके सቛኋथ दगं०्ቚ०सगं० ककी धिቛኋरቛኋ -107/116 वि 116 (3) कके तहत आख्यቛኋ भली ्ቚस्तसुत ककी गयली वक सन्तदोष धसगंह आवद वि रቛኋकके श धसगंह कके मध्य जमलीनली वविविቛኋद कदो लके करकके कቛኋफकी कसलीदगली वि तनቛኋवि व्यቛኋ्቎ हहै, ददोनोሪ पकोሪ कदो भቛኋरली सके भቛኋरली जमቛኋनत वि मसुचलकके पर पቛኋबन्द वकयቛኋ जቛኋयके। भभूवम गቛኋरቛኋ सगं० - 378,373 वि 482 पर कब्जकेदቛኋरली कदो लके करकके ्ቚबल शቛኋनन्त व्यविस्थቛኋ कके दृवቖኌगत दगं०्ቚ०सगं० ककी धिቛኋरቛኋ -145 कके तहत कቛኋयरविቛኋहली ्ቚचधलत हहै, जहቛኋगं वदतलीय पक कቛኋ कथन हहै वक ्ቚकरण कके सम्बन्धि मम दलीविቛኋनली न्यቛኋयቛኋलय मम विቛኋद वविचቛኋरቛኋधिलीन रहतके हहए 145 दगं०्ቚ०सगं० ककी कቛኋयरविቛኋहली नहीሻ ककी जቛኋ सकतली हहै, वकन्तसु वदतलीय पक दቛኋरቛኋ अपनके कथन कके समथरन मम दलीविቛኋनली न्यቛኋयቛኋलय मम वविचቛኋरቛኋधिलीन विቛኋद ककी कदोई सቛኋቌኚय स्विरूप ्ቚवत दቛኋधखिल नहीሻ ककी गयली हहै"- कቛኋ वनष्कषर दकेतके हहए वविदቛኋन अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय दቛኋरቛኋ ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ-पत 145 (5) पदोषणलीय न हदोनके कके कቛኋरण 146 (1) दगं०्ቚ०सगं० पर बहस हकेतसु पतቛኋविलली वनयत कर दली गयली। इस ्ቚकቛኋर जቛኋवहर हहै वक वविदቛኋन अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय दቛኋरቛኋ उभयपकोሪ कदो ससुनकर एविगं विቛኋद सके सम्बनन्धित भभूवम कके बቛኋवित थቛኋनके ककी चቛኋलቛኋनली आख्यቛኋ कቛኋ उलकेखि अपनके आदकेश मम करतके हहए वविस्ततृत आदकेश पቛኋररत वकयቛኋ गयቛኋ एविगं अपनके आदकेश मम ककी गई वविविकेचनቛኋ कके ्ቅम मम ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ-पत अन्तगरत धिቛኋरቛኋ-145 (5) दगं०्ቚ०सगं० पदोषणलीय न हदोनके कके कቛኋरण वनरस्त वकयके जቛኋनके कቛኋ आदकेश पቛኋररत वकयቛኋ गयቛኋ हहै। इस ्ቚकቛኋर जቛኋवहर हहै वक वविदቛኋन अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय नके सभली ्ቚपतोሪ कቛኋ अविलदोकन वकयके जቛኋनके कके पश्चቛኋत एविगं ्ቚस्तसुत मቛኋमलके कके सभली तथ्योሪ पर वविचቛኋर करतके हहए अन्तररम आदकेश पቛኋररत वकयቛኋ हहै, धजससके वकसली भली पक कके वविविቛኋवदत भभूवम सके सम्बनन्धित अधधिकቛኋरोሪ पर कदोई वविपरलीत ्ቚभቛኋवि पड़तቛኋ नजर नहीሻ आ रहቛኋ हहै। ऐसली नस्थवत मम वविदቛኋन अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय उप धजलቛኋ मधजस्रट केर तरबगगंज, गदोण्डቛኋ दቛኋरቛኋ पቛኋररत आककेवपत आदकेश मम कदोई अविहैधिቛኋवनकतቛኋ नहीሻ पቛኋयली जቛኋतली हहै। अततः आककेवपत आदकेश वदनቛኋगंवकत 19.06.2023 मम न्यቛኋय ककी दृवቖኌ सके हस्तककेप वकयቛኋ जቛኋनቛኋ न्यቛኋयदोवचत ्ቚतलीत नहीሻ हदोतቛኋ हहै। तद्नसुसቛኋर दቛኋनण्डक वनगरቛኋनली न्यቛኋयवहत मम वनरस्त वकयके जቛኋनके यदोग्य हहै। आदकेश दቛኋनण्डक वनगरቛኋनली सगंख्यቛኋ-268/2023, रቛኋकके श धसगंह बनቛኋम सन्तदोष धसगंह आवद वनरस्त ककी जቛኋतली हहै। तलबशसुदቛኋ पतቛኋविलली, आदकेश ककी ्ቚवत सवहत अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय कदो अवविलम्ब विቛኋपस भकेजली जቛኋविके।"

4. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of this Court dated 20.12.2023 passed in Application u/s 482 No.9198 of 2021 (Aman Deep Singh Shishya Vs. State of U.P. & another). The relevant portion of the order reads as under. "6. Having considered the rival submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perusal of record, it is manifested that property in question is known as Hari Nikunj Ashram. Present applicant (first party) is claiming his right and title over the property in question on the basis of registered sale deed and the gift deed said to have been executed by then owners of the property in question in favour of the predecessor in the interest of the applicant herein. However, opposite party no.2 is claiming his right and title over the property in question through separate society. At this juncture, it would not be befitting to consider this aspect of the matter which relates to the right and title of the parties and the same is subjudice before the civil court in Original Suit No.15 of 2021. Admittedly, Original Suit No.15 of 2021 has been filed on 16.01.2021. However, having considered the delay in decision on the interim injunction application (7-C), present applicant has invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court by way of filing a petition under Article 227 No.115 of 2021. Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.01.2021 has disposed of the aforesaid petition with a direction to decide the interim injunction application (Paper No.7-C) within a period of one month, however, for a period of two months or till the decision on the interim injunction application, whichever is earlier, parties were directed to maintain status-quo. During the existence of two months protection for maintaining status-quo and the pendency of the suit, police has submitted report dated 02.03.2021, which was taken into account while passing the preliminary order under Section 145 (1) Cr.P.C. Thus, order impugned has been passed not only during pendency of the suit but also during existence of the interim order granted by this Court. Apart from that while rejecting the interim injunction application, vide order dated 09.09.2021, learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mathura has made an observation acknowledging the possession of the present applicant over the property in question, however, he has refused to grant interim injunction on the ground that plaintiff/applicant has failed to prove his possession legal. Learned Civil Court might has not passed interim injunction in favour of the present applicant, however, in my considered opinion, his observation with respect to the possession of the present applicant over the property in question cannot be ignored particularly for the purposes of parallel criminal proceeding under Section 145 (1) Cr.P.C. Opposite party no.2 herein has been arrayed as defendant no.1 in the Original Suit No.15 of 2021 and he has an ample opportunity to move an appropriate application before the Civil Court to get injunction in his favour with respect to the property in question along with the counter claim to establish his legal right and title over there. On the premise of pendency of the civil suit which has already been instituted on 06.01.2021 prior to the police report dated 02.01.2021 and preliminary order dated 04.01.2021 under Section 145 (1) Cr.P.C., there is no justification to continue the parallel criminal proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. to examine the possession of the parties over the property in question. In the matter of Amrish Tiwari (supra) proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. was dropped by learned Magistrate considering the pendency of the civil suit, however, same was reversed by the higher court. Hon'ble Supreme Court has upheld the order passed by learned Sub- Divisional Magistrate and held that multiplicity of the litigation should be avoided as it is not in the interest of the parties and the public time would be wasted over meaningless litigation. It is further observed that when possession is being examined by the civil court and the parties are in a position to approach the civil court for adequate protection of the property during pendency of the dispute, the parallel proceeding i.e. under Section 145 Cr.P.C. should not continue. Hon'ble Supreme Court in said case has considered the ratio decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ram Sumer Puri Mahant (supra). For ready reference relevant paragraph Nos.12, 13 and 14 of the judgement passed in the case of Amresh Tiwari (supra) is quoted hereinbelow:- "12. The question then is whether there is any infirmity in the order of the S.D.M. discontinuing the proceedings under Section 145 Criminal Procedure Code. The law on this subject-matter has been settled by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram

case between the parties is pending before the civil court. The operative portion of the order dated 19.06.2023 reads as under. "ददोनोሪ पकोሪ कके वविदቛኋन अधधिविकቛኋ ककी बहस ससुननके कके उपरቛኋन्त पतቛኋविलली कቛኋ अविलदोकन वकयቛኋ गयቛኋ। नቛኋरली वनरलीकक थቛኋनቛኋ उमरलीबकेगमगगंज दቛኋरቛኋ ्ቚस्तसुत चቛኋलቛኋनली ररपदोरर वदनቛኋगंवकत 25.11.2022 पर सगंजቛኋन लकेकर सगं० ककी धिቛኋरቛኋ-145(1) कके तहत नदोवरस वनगरत ककी गयली हहै। वदतलीय पक रቛኋकके श धसगंह कके पक मम वनष्पቛኋवदत हቛኋमलीयतनቛኋमቛኋ कके आधिቛኋर पर भभूवम गቛኋरቛኋ सगंख्यቛኋ 378, 482 वि 373 ककी दቛኋधखिल खिቛኋररज रቛኋकके श धसगंह कके पक मम अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय दቛኋरቛኋ ककी गयली, धजसकके वविरु्ቍ ्ቚथम पक सन्तदोष धसगंह आवद कके दቛኋरቛኋ विቛኋजदቛኋयर ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ पत वदयቛኋ गयቛኋ। विቛኋजदቛኋयर ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ पत कके ्ቅम मम विसलीयतनቛኋमቛኋ कके आधिቛኋर पर पቛኋररत दቛኋधखिल खिቛኋररज कቛኋ आदकेश वदनቛኋगंक 05.10.2018 कदो आदकेश वदनቛኋगंक 17.02.2021 कके दቛኋरቛኋ स्थवगत वकयቛኋ गयቛኋ। भभूवम गቛኋरቛኋ सगंख्यቛኋ 482, 378, 373 पर ददोनोሪ पकोሪ कके मध्य कब्जकेदቛኋरली कदो लके करकके ्ቚबल शቛኋनन्त व्यविस्थቛኋ कके दृवቖኌगत ्ቚभቛኋरली वनरलीकक दቛኋरቛኋ 25.11.2022 कदो चቛኋलቛኋनली ररपदोरर ्ቚकेवषत कर अन्तगरत धिቛኋरቛኋ -146 द०्ቚ०सगं० कके तहत कቛኋयरविቛኋहली वकए जቛኋनके कके सቛኋथ ८०्ቚ०सगं० ककी धिቛኋरቛኋ -107/116 वि 116 (3) कके तहत आख्यቛኋ भली ्ቚस्तसुत ककी गयली वक सन्तदोष धसगंह आवद वि रቛኋकके श धसगंह कके मध्य जमलीनली वविविቛኋद कदो लके करकके कቛኋफकी कसलीदगली वि तनቛኋवि व्यቛኋ्቎ हहै, ददोनोሪ पकोሪ कदो भቛኋरली सके भቛኋरली जमቛኋनत वि मसुचलकके पर पቛኋविरन्द वकयቛኋ जቛኋय। भभूवम गቛኋरቛኋ सगंख्यቛኋ 378, 373 वि 482 पर कब्जकेदቛኋरली कदो लके करकके पबत शቛኋनन्त व्यविस्थቛኋ कके दृवቖኌयत ६०्ቚ०सगं० ककी धिቛኋरቛኋ-145 कके तहत कቛኋयरविቛኋहली ्ቚचधलत हहै , जहቛኋगं वदतलीय पक कቛኋ कथन हहै वक ्ቚकरण कके सम्बन्धि मम दलीविቛኋनली न्यቛኋयቛኋलय मम विቛኋद वविचቛኋरቛኋधिलीन रहतके हहए 145 द०्ቚ०सगं० ककी कቛኋयरविቛኋहली नहली ककी सकतली हहै , वकन्तसु वदतलीय पक दቛኋरቛኋ अपनके कथन कके समथरन मम मቛኋ० दलीविቛኋनली न्यቛኋयቛኋलय मम वविचቛኋरቛኋधिलीन विቛኋद ककी कदोई सቛኋቌኚय स्विरुप ्ቚवत दቛኋधखिल नहीሻ ककी गयली हहै। उपरदोक वविविकेचनቛኋ कके आधिቛኋर पर ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ पत 145 (5) द०्ቚ०सगं० वदनቛኋगंवकत 26.12.2022 पदोषणलीय न हदोनके कके कቛኋरण वनरस्त हदोनके यदोग्य हहै। आदकेश अततः तदद नसुसቛኋर ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ पत 145 (5) द०्ቚ०सगं० वदनቛኋगंवकत 26.12.2022 वनरस्त वकयቛኋ जቛኋतቛኋ हहै। ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ पत 146 (1) द०्ቚ०सगं० पर बहस हकेतसु पतቛኋविलली वदनቛኋगंक 06.07.2023 कदो पकेश हदो।"

3. The applicant has also assailed the order dated 12.12.2023 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C., Gonda (in short 'Revisional Court') in Criminal Revision No.268 of 2023 (Rakesh Singh Vs. Santosh Singh and 3 others). The relevant portion of the order reads as under. "अविलदोकन सके वविवदत हहै वक वविदቛኋन न्यቛኋयቛኋलय दቛኋरቛኋ उपरदोक ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ -पत पर उभयपकोሪ कके वविदቛኋन अधधिविकቛኋ ककी बहस ससुनकर एविगं पतቛኋविलली कቛኋ अविलदोकन करनके कके पश्चቛኋत आककेवपत आदकेश मम चቛኋलቛኋनली ररपदोरर कቛኋ उलकेखि करतके हहए एविगं अपनके आदकेश कके वनष्कषर मम यह उवलधखित करतके हहए वक - "भभूवम गቛኋरቛኋ सगंख्यቛኋ-482,378,373 पर ददोनोሪ पकोሪ कके मध्य कब्जकेदቛኋरली कदो लके करकके ्ቚबल शቛኋनन्त व्यविस्थቛኋ कके दृवቖኌगत ्ቚभቛኋरली वनरलीकक 25.11.2022 कदो चቛኋलቛኋनली ररपदोरर ्ቚकेवषत कर अन्तगरत धिቛኋरቛኋ -146 दगं०्ቚ०सगं० कके तहत कቛኋयरविቛኋहली वकयके जቛኋनके कके सቛኋथ दगं०्ቚ०सगं० ककी धिቛኋरቛኋ -107/116 वि 116 (3) कके तहत आख्यቛኋ भली ्ቚस्तसुत ककी गयली वक सन्तदोष धसगंह आवद वि रቛኋकके श धसगंह कके मध्य जमलीनली वविविቛኋद कदो लके करकके कቛኋफकी कसलीदगली वि तनቛኋवि व्यቛኋ्቎ हहै, ददोनोሪ पकोሪ कदो भቛኋरली सके भቛኋरली जमቛኋनत वि मसुचलकके पर पቛኋबन्द वकयቛኋ जቛኋयके। भभूवम गቛኋरቛኋ सगं० - 378,373 वि 482 पर कब्जकेदቛኋरली कदो लके करकके ्ቚबल शቛኋनन्त व्यविस्थቛኋ कके दृवቖኌगत दगं०्ቚ०सगं० ककी धिቛኋरቛኋ -145 कके तहत कቛኋयरविቛኋहली ्ቚचधलत हहै, जहቛኋगं वदतलीय पक कቛኋ कथन हहै वक ्ቚकरण कके सम्बन्धि मम दलीविቛኋनली न्यቛኋयቛኋलय मम विቛኋद वविचቛኋरቛኋधिलीन रहतके हहए 145 दगं०्ቚ०सगं० ककी कቛኋयरविቛኋहली नहीሻ ककी जቛኋ सकतली हहै, वकन्तसु वदतलीय पक दቛኋरቛኋ अपनके कथन कके समथरन मम दलीविቛኋनली न्यቛኋयቛኋलय मम वविचቛኋरቛኋधिलीन विቛኋद ककी कदोई सቛኋቌኚय स्विरूप ्ቚवत दቛኋधखिल नहीሻ ककी गयली हहै"- कቛኋ वनष्कषर दकेतके हहए वविदቛኋन अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय दቛኋरቛኋ ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ-पत 145 (5) पदोषणलीय न हदोनके कके कቛኋरण 146 (1) दगं०्ቚ०सगं० पर बहस हकेतसु पतቛኋविलली वनयत कर दली गयली। इस ्ቚकቛኋर जቛኋवहर हहै वक वविदቛኋन अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय दቛኋरቛኋ उभयपकोሪ कदो ससुनकर एविगं विቛኋद सके सम्बनन्धित भभूवम कके बቛኋवित थቛኋनके ककी चቛኋलቛኋनली आख्यቛኋ कቛኋ उलकेखि अपनके आदकेश मम करतके हहए वविस्ततृत आदकेश पቛኋररत वकयቛኋ गयቛኋ एविगं अपनके आदकेश मम ककी गई वविविकेचनቛኋ कके ्ቅम मम ्ቚቛኋथरनቛኋ-पत अन्तगरत धिቛኋरቛኋ-145 (5) दगं०्ቚ०सगं० पदोषणलीय न हदोनके कके कቛኋरण वनरस्त वकयके जቛኋनके कቛኋ आदकेश पቛኋररत वकयቛኋ गयቛኋ हहै। इस ्ቚकቛኋर जቛኋवहर हहै वक वविदቛኋन अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय नके सभली ्ቚपतोሪ कቛኋ अविलदोकन वकयके जቛኋनके कके पश्चቛኋत एविगं ्ቚस्तसुत मቛኋमलके कके सभली तथ्योሪ पर वविचቛኋर करतके हहए अन्तररम आदकेश पቛኋररत वकयቛኋ हहै, धजससके वकसली भली पक कके वविविቛኋवदत भभूवम सके सम्बनन्धित अधधिकቛኋरोሪ पर कदोई वविपरलीत ्ቚभቛኋवि पड़तቛኋ नजर नहीሻ आ रहቛኋ हहै। ऐसली नस्थवत मम वविदቛኋन अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय उप धजलቛኋ मधजस्रट केर तरबगगंज, गदोण्डቛኋ दቛኋरቛኋ पቛኋररत आककेवपत आदकेश मम कदोई अविहैधिቛኋवनकतቛኋ नहीሻ पቛኋयली जቛኋतली हहै। अततः आककेवपत आदकेश वदनቛኋगंवकत 19.06.2023 मम न्यቛኋय ककी दृवቖኌ सके हस्तककेप वकयቛኋ जቛኋनቛኋ न्यቛኋयदोवचत ्ቚतलीत नहीሻ हदोतቛኋ हहै। तद्नसुसቛኋर दቛኋनण्डक वनगरቛኋनली न्यቛኋयवहत मम वनरस्त वकयके जቛኋनके यदोग्य हहै। आदकेश दቛኋनण्डक वनगरቛኋनली सगंख्यቛኋ-268/2023, रቛኋकके श धसगंह बनቛኋम सन्तदोष धसगंह आवद वनरस्त ककी जቛኋतली हहै। तलबशसुदቛኋ पतቛኋविलली, आदकेश ककी ्ቚवत सवहत अविर न्यቛኋयቛኋलय कदो अवविलम्ब विቛኋपस भकेजली जቛኋविके।"

4. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of this Court dated 20.12.2023 passed in Application u/s 482 No.9198 of 2021 (Aman Deep Singh Shishya Vs. State of U.P. & another). The relevant portion of the order reads as under. "6. Having considered the rival submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perusal of record, it is manifested that property in question is known as Hari Nikunj Ashram. Present applicant (first party) is claiming his right and title over the property in question on the basis of registered sale deed and the gift deed said to have been executed by then owners of the property in question in favour of the predecessor in the interest of the applicant herein. However, opposite party no.2 is claiming his right and title over the property in question through separate society. At this juncture, it would not be befitting to consider this aspect of the matter which relates to the right and title of the parties and the same is subjudice before the civil court in Original Suit No.15 of 2021. Admittedly, Original Suit No.15 of 2021 has been filed on 16.01.2021. However, having considered the delay in decision on the interim injunction application (7-C), present applicant has invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court by way of filing a petition under Article 227 No.115 of 2021. Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.01.2021 has disposed of the aforesaid petition with a direction to decide the interim injunction application (Paper No.7-C) within a period of one month, however, for a period of two months or till the decision on the interim injunction application, whichever is earlier, parties were directed to maintain status-quo. During the existence of two months protection for maintaining status-quo and the pendency of the suit, police has submitted report dated 02.03.2021, which was taken into account while passing the preliminary order under Section 145 (1) Cr.P.C. Thus, order impugned has been passed not only during pendency of the suit but also during existence of the interim order granted by this Court. Apart from that while rejecting the interim injunction application, vide order dated 09.09.2021, learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mathura has made an observation acknowledging the possession of the present applicant over the property in question, however, he has refused to grant interim injunction on the ground that plaintiff/applicant has failed to prove his possession legal. Learned Civil Court might has not passed interim injunction in favour of the present applicant, however, in my considered opinion, his observation with respect to the possession of the present applicant over the property in question cannot be ignored particularly for the purposes of parallel criminal proceeding under Section 145 (1) Cr.P.C. Opposite party no.2 herein has been arrayed as defendant no.1 in the Original Suit No.15 of 2021 and he has an ample opportunity to move an appropriate application before the Civil Court to get injunction in his favour with respect to the property in question along with the counter claim to establish his legal right and title over there. On the premise of pendency of the civil suit which has already been instituted on 06.01.2021 prior to the police report dated 02.01.2021 and preliminary order dated 04.01.2021 under Section 145 (1) Cr.P.C., there is no justification to continue the parallel criminal proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. to examine the possession of the parties over the property in question. In the matter of Amrish Tiwari (supra) proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. was dropped by learned Magistrate considering the pendency of the civil suit, however, same was reversed by the higher court. Hon'ble Supreme Court has upheld the order passed by learned Sub- Divisional Magistrate and held that multiplicity of the litigation should be avoided as it is not in the interest of the parties and the public time would be wasted over meaningless litigation. It is further observed that when possession is being examined by the civil court and the parties are in a position to approach the civil court for adequate protection of the property during pendency of the dispute, the parallel proceeding i.e. under Section 145 Cr.P.C. should not continue. Hon'ble Supreme Court in said case has considered the ratio decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ram Sumer Puri Mahant (supra). For ready reference relevant paragraph Nos.12, 13 and 14 of the judgement passed in the case of Amresh Tiwari (supra) is quoted hereinbelow:- "12. The question then is whether there is any infirmity in the order of the S.D.M. discontinuing the proceedings under Section 145 Criminal Procedure Code. The law on this subject-matter has been settled by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram