Arpit Verma v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the Respondent No. 2 /District Magistrate, Ayodhya should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner.
- Para 55. Accordingly, the Respondent No. 2 /District Magistrate, Ayodhya is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a 2 WRIC No. 10920 of 2025 period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity…
- Para 66. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 27, 2025 Lokesh Kumar (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Judgment
Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.
This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part respondents deciding representations dated 18.02.2025 and 06.10.2025 filed by the petitioner for claim of compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the Respondent No. 2 /District Magistrate, Ayodhya should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the Respondent No. 2 /District Magistrate, Ayodhya is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a 2 WRIC No. 10920 of 2025 period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Operative part
With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 27, 2025 Lokesh Kumar (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.