Sameer Kumar Maurya @ Mannu v. Vikas Sharma
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ss. 358, 438, 442
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 504
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 319
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. On being confronted, after taking note of the facts of the case as also the observations regarding the testimony of an injured witness made in the judgments passed in the case of State of M.P. vs. Mansingh, (2003) 10 SCC 414; Jarnail Singh v.…
- Para 44. Accordingly, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. October 13, 2025 ML/- (Saurabh Lavania,J.) MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant criminal revision under Section 438/442 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed against the judgment and order dated 03.09.2025, passed by the Additional District & Session Judge/Special Judge, PC Act, Court No.5, Lucknow in S.T. No.863/2012 (State of U.P. Vs. Indrajeet & others) relating to Case Crime No.284/2011 under Section 323, 504 I.P.C., Police Station - Malihabad, District -Lucknow by which the revisionist has been summoned on the application under Section 358 BNSS, 2023 (akin to Section 319 Cr.P.C.) filed by the complainant Pramod Kumar.
On being confronted, after taking note of the facts of the case as also the observations regarding the testimony of an injured witness made in the judgments passed in the case of State of M.P. vs. Mansingh, (2003) 10 SCC 414; Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab, (2009) 9 SCC 719; Balraje @ Trimbak v. State of Maharashtra, (2010) 6 SCC 673; Abdul Sayeed vs. State of M.P., (2010) 10 SCC 259; State of U.P. vs. Naresh, (2011) 4 SCC 324; Laxman Singh vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) 2 CRLR No. 1144 of 2025 (2021) 9 SCC 191; Balu Sudam Khalde and another vs. State of Maharashtra, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 355], the learned counsel for the revisionist stated that he may be permitted to withdraw the revision and the same may be dismissed accordingly with liberty to the revisionist to avail the benefit of the judgment passed in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116, according to which once the investigation is over and the charge-sheet is filed then the accused should be asked to appear before the Court concerned and should furnish bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court.
Operative part
Accordingly, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. October 13, 2025 ML/- (Saurabh Lavania,J.) MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 358, 438, 442; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 504; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 319.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.