Smt. Priyanka Kasodhan Alias Priyanka v. Sri Bal Kishan Kasodhan
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
wife, the present application is allowed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Considering the inconvenience faced by the applicant- wife, the present application is allowed. The proceedings pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Sultanpur are transferred to the equivalent court at District Ayodhya. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Arun ARUN KUMAR High Court of…
Judgment
Applicant :- Smt. Priyanka Kasodhan Alias Priyanka Gupta Opposite Party :- Sri Bal Kishan Kasodhan Counsel for Applicant :- Shadab Waheed, Syed Raza Mehdi Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned Counsel for the opposite party.
Office report reveals that the respondent is avoiding the service of notice.
The present application under Section 24 of C.P.C. has been preferred by the applicant for transfer of OS No.883 of 2024 (Bal Kishan Kasodhan Vs. Priyanka Kasodhan) from the Principal Judge, Family Court, Sultanpur to the equivalent court at District Ayodhya
Operative part
Considering the inconvenience faced by the applicant- wife, the present application is allowed. The proceedings pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Sultanpur are transferred to the equivalent court at District Ayodhya. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Arun ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: wife, the present application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 24.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 23 Apr 2025. The bench was PANKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.