Deepu @ Deepu Saroj v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 308(4), 351(3), 352
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts.
- Para 77. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Apex Court in re; Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
Judgment
Heard Ms. Nirmala Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ashwini Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 3 and perused the record.
In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with.
This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. bearing FIR/Case Crime No.355 of 2025, for the offence under Sections 308 (4), 352, 351 (3) of B.N.S., Police Station- Lalganj , District- Pratapgarh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in the FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas the police is trying to arrest the petitioner, which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.
Learned A.G.A. appearing for respondent-State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in re; Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273 , and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51. 2 CRLP No. 9240 of 2025
Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts.
Operative part
Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Apex Court in re; Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
However, it is directed that the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 31.10.2025 at 11:00 AM sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, he shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. . (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) October 17, 2025 Anuj Singh ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 308(4), 351(3), 352.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.