✦ Allahabad High Court

2024 Mulayam Singh Yadav State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko v. Central Bureau of Investigation: (2022) 10 SCC & Anr.

CR.P.C No. 2439 of 2024SUBHASH VIDYARTHI

Case at a glance

Bench
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI

Outcome

Disposed of

In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with…

Judgment

1.

Heard Ms. Ananya, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rizwanul Haque Ansari, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Virendra Kumar, the learned A.G.A-I appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records.

2.

The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on in Case Crime No.207 of 2023, under Sections anticipatory bail 323/504/506/34/325/308 I.P.C. registered at Police Station- Chanda, District- Sultanpur.

3.

After arguing the matter at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant states that she does not want to press the application and she restricted her prayer for giving her an opportunity to file an application for bail.

Operative part

4.

In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 17, 2025 Ram. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CR.P.C No. 2439 of 2024). ← Search more judgments