Arunesh Kumar v. State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home

Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present application has been filed for the following main relief(s):- "For the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash/set aside the order dated 17.07.2025 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Third Lucknow, in Complaint Case No. 2174/2020, Priyanka Verma Vs Arunesh Kumar & others, under Sections- 498A/494/323 IPC & 3/4 D.P Act, P.S.-Hasanganj, District-Lucknow, by which the N.B.W has been issued against the applicant and extend the interim bail of the applicant. " Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Inder Mohan Goswami and another vs. State of Uttranchal and others reported in (2007) 12 SCC 1, Sunil Tyagi vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3597 and Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and the statement of counsel for the applicant that the applicant would appear before the court concerned, it is provided that if the applicant appears before the court concerned within two weeks from today and move an appropriate application before the trial court including for recall of non- bailable warrant, the same shall be considered and decided by the trial court expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. 2 A482 No. 7768 of 2025 For a period of two weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant so far as the proceedings in issue are concerned. In case, the applicant does not appear in terms of this order, coercive action shall be taken against him. The present application is disposed of in above terms. September 15, 2025 Jyoti/- (Saurabh Lavania,J.) JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench