✦ High Court of India · 09 Sep 2025

State Of U.P v. Prateek Jaiswal contain in annexure No

Case Details High Court of India · 09 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
09 Sep 2025
Length
1,049 words

Acts & Sections

5. On being confronted taking note of aforesaid, the learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that he does not want to press this revision and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.

6. To the aforesaid prayer, there is no objection.

7. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. September 9, 2025 Vinay/- (Saurabh Lavania,J.) VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

5. On being confronted taking note of aforesaid, the learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that he does not want to press this revision and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.

6. To the aforesaid prayer, there is no objection.

7. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. September 9, 2025 Vinay/- (Saurabh Lavania,J.) VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments