APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION v. Union Of India & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- JASPREET SINGH
Outcome
Dismissed
appellant, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Since, there is none to press the appeal and also noticing the earlier order dated 26.08.2025, in absence of the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Judgment
None appeared for the appellant whereas Shri Mohd. Yasir Abbasi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has sent a request for attending the proceedings through video conferencing.
Operative part
Since, there is none to press the appeal and also noticing the earlier order dated 26.08.2025, in absence of the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Consigned to record. September 8, 2025 Rakesh/- (Jaspreet Singh,J.) RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: appellant, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 37.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.