Ujala & Anr. v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 21
Judgment
Heard Shri Sachin Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to respondent no.4 is dispensed with.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer :- "(i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite party no. 1 to 3 not to harass the Petitioners on the behest of opposite party no.4, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite party no. 1 to 3 to ensure protection of lives of the petitioner no.1 and the petitioner no.2."
It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and have married with each other by their own free will on 19.08.2025 as per Hindu rites at Arya Samaj Mandir, Shivpuri, Kamta, Chinhat, Lucknow. In this regard, reliance has been placed on the marriage certificate as well as their age certificate, annexed as Annexure Nos.1, 3 and 4, respectively to the writ petition. They are enjoying and living peaceful matrimonial life. There is no first information report lodged against the petitioners till date.
However, opposite party no.4, being annoyed with their marriage, is creating hindrance in order to disturb their matrimonial life with the help 2 CRLP No. 7875 of 2025 of police authority of concerned police station. So, they have approached this Court, for redressal of their grievances, by filing the present writ petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon the law laid down in paragraph 17 of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2006 (5) SCC 475 which reads as under:- "17..... We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities throughout the country will see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a women or man who is a major, the couple is not harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence, and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law. "
The petitioners have also pleaded for protection under Article 21 of the Constitution of India which guarantees liberty to lead life of their own with dignity.
The petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful life and liberty of the petitioners in any manner. August 29, 2025 Raj (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.