Km. Shalini v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Child Development
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 21 Aug 2025
- Bench
- MANISH MATHUR
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC-LKO:48936
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Considering such submissions, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 kvg/- GIREESAN KV GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Lucknow Bench
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned to correct the caste category in the online application form as Scheduled Caste in place of Scheduled Tribe in pursuance of advertisement dated 17.12.2024.
Ms. Deepshikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 17.08.2025, a copy of which is taken on record and as per which petitioner's representation has already been rejected by order dated 11.06.2025, which has not been challenged.
A copy of order dated 11.06.2025 has been provided to learned counsel for petitioner.
Learned counsel for petitioner therefore, seeks liberty to withdraw this petition in order to file afresh.
Considering such submissions, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 kvg/- GIREESAN KV GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 21 Aug 2025. The bench was MANISH MATHUR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.