Smt. Kanchan Prabha Sharma v. Anurag Shukla
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 24
- Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 s. 13(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Considering the inconvenience faced by the applicant, the present application is allowed. The proceedings pending in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Etah is transferred to the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Hardoi. September 16, 2025 Haseen U. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) HASEENUDDIN High…
Judgment
Smt. Kanchan Prabha Sharma Shri Sunil Kumar Versus .....Applicant(s) .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) Anurag Shukla : : Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
The office report indicates that the service of notice on the opposite party is sufficient but no one appeared for the opposite party.
The present application under Section 24 of C.P.C. has been preferred by the applicant for transfer of matrimonial proceedings of Case No.187 of 2021, Under Section 13(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Shri Sunil Kumar Vs. Smt. Kanchan Prabha) from the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Etah to the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Hardoi.
Considering the inconvenience faced by the applicant, the present application is allowed. The proceedings pending in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Etah is transferred to the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Hardoi. September 16, 2025 Haseen U. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.