High Court · 2025

2. Heard Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant/Smt. Rajrani and Sri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned AGA for the State of U.P. as well as perused the record.

3. The instant application has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 20.05.2025 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act) Hardoi in complaint case no. 391/2024, Police Station Beniganj, District Hardoi, contained in Annexure no. 1 to this application."

4. Brief facts for the case in hand, which are relevant for the purposes of deciding the instant application, are as under:- (i) An FIR was lodged on 27.09.2024 at about 19:05 hours by the Vijay Bahadur (opposite party No. 3 herein) s/o Veerendra R/o Purwa Baajirao, Police Station- Beniganj, District- Hardoi registered as FIR No. 0462/2024, under Sections- 351(2) B.N.S., akin to Section 506 IPC, and Section 352 B.N.S., akin to 504 IPC, Police Station- Beniganj, District- Hardoi. (ii) As per the aforesaid FIR, accused Kallu Singh s/o Ramjivan Singh, husband of the applicant/Smt. Rajrani, and Monu Singh s/o Kallu Singh R/o Village- Nibaha, Post- Jarauva, Police Station- Beniganj, District- Hardoi hurled abuses and also threatened the opposite party No. 3 for life. (iii) After the aforesaid FIR, an application case was preferred by the applicant/Smt. Rajrani w/o Kallu, an accused of FIR No. 0462/2024, detailed above, making allegations therein against the private opposite parties to attract the offence as indicated under Section 376-D IPC. As per this application, the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 namely Vinod and Vijay Bahadur committed rape with the minor daughter of the applicant on 22.09.2024 at about 7.00 P.M. in an open area i.e. agricultural field. (iv) As the FIR in regard to the incident dated 22.09.2024 was not lodged, the applicant preferred an application/complaint in terms of Section 173(4) B.N.S.S., akin to Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., before the competent court of jurisdiction. The Special Judge (POCSO Act), Hardoi (in short "court concerned") treated the said application as complaint case. (v) After the aforesaid, the statements of victim, victim's mother and victim's father were recorded. (vi) As per the statement of victim recorded before the court concerned, opposite party No. 2/Vinod s/o Kalicharan and opposite party No. 3/Vijay Bahadur s/o Veerendra, informant of FIR No. 0462/2024, detailed above, in intoxicating condition committed rape with victim in an agricultural field. (vii) Other witnesses also supported the story of the prosecution. (viii) It would be apt to indicate here that in the aforesaid case, the private opposite parties, named above, filed an objection (Annexure No. 6 to the instant application) and according to the same, with oblique motive, allegations of committing rape have been levelled against the objectors. (ix) According to the aforesaid objection, on account of encroachment of road, the proceedings in terms of Section 133 Cr.P.C. are pending before the Magistrate concerned. In this regard, documentary evidence was placed on record, however, before this Court, learned counsel for the applicant has not placed the same, though, it ought to have been done. (x) From the aforesaid objection (Annexure No. 6 to the instant application) particularly paragraph 3 of the same, it is also evident that with regard to an incident of 18.06.2024, a complaint case instituted by Sushila w/o Vinod (opposite party No. 2 herein) is pending. (xi) Thereafter, after considering the material available on record, the court concerned rejected the aforesaid complaint case registered as Case No. 391/2024 (Rajrani vs. Vinod and others) vide impugned order dated 20.05.2025, which reads as under:- " पततवलल पपश हहई। पपकतर पर पररवतददनल कप अधधवकत कक तलबल कप दबनदप पर सपनत गयत तसत पततवलल कत अवलककन दकयत गयत। दवदतन अधधवकत उपसससत। पररवतददनल कप दवदतन उपदनरलकक कप ररतपश चचहतन, बजप पतधसरनल कक पपतल उम 15 इस पकतर हह दक पतधसरनल / ' दवपकल सब० 3 दवजय बहतदपर, पररवतद सप समबबधधत तथय सबकपप मम पररवतददनल रतजरतनल कप दतरत दवपकल सब० 1 दवनकद, दवपकल सब० 2 पभतरल दनरलकक सतनत बपनलगबज एवब दवपकल सब० 4 दवरद एक पतसरनतपत अनतगरत धतरत 173(4) बल०एन०एस०एस० मय शपसपत इस आशय कत पसतपत दकयत गयत दक ददनतबक 22.09.2024 कक शतम 7 वरर शचच गई सल दक रतसतप मम गतगव कप दवनकद पपत कतललचरन व दवजय बहतदपर पपत वलरपनद शरतब कप नशप मम पतधसरनल कक पपतल कक पकड धलयत और मप गह दबत कर खपत मम लप जतकर बलततकतर दकयत। पतधसरनल कक कक पपतल कतफक डरल हहई घर पहह बचल। घर वतलल कप पपछनप पर डर कक वजह सप कप छ न बतत सकक। अगलप ददन घर वतलल कप पपछनप पर पतधसरनल कक पपतल नप पपरल घटनत पतधसरनल व पररवतर वतलल कक बततई। ददनतबक 24.09.2024 कक पतधसरनल दतरत सतनत बपनलगबज मम पतसरनतपत ददयत, परनतप पपधलस दतरत सपबह सप शतम तक पतधसरनल व पतधसरनल कक पपतल कक सतनप मम दबठतयप रखत तसत पतधसरनल कक पपतल कक कमरप मम जतकर बपरल तरह दबतव बनतयत गयत। गनदल तरह सप बतत कक गई। शतम कक पतधसरनल व पतधसरनल कक पपतल कक कहत गयत दक रकज 10 ददनल तक तपमहम सतनप पर बपलतयमगप, परनतप पपधलस दतरत पतधसरनल कप पदत कक सतनप पर आनप कत दबतव बनतयत गयत, ततदक दबतव बनतकर मतमलप कक रफत दफत दकयत जत सकप , परनतप पपधलस दतरत ररपकटर दजर नहह कक गयल। उक पतसरनतपत पर समबबधधत सतनप सप आखयत आहहत कक गयल जक सबलग पततवलल हह। नयतयतलय कप आदपश ददनतबदकत 12.11.2024 कप दतरत उक पतसरनतपत पररवतद कप रप मम पबजलकक त दकयत गयत। पररवतद कप समसरन मम पररवतददनल कप बयतन अनतगरत धतरत 223 बल०एन० एस०एस० अबदकत पल०डबलप० 2 करतयत गयत तसत धतरत 225 बल०एन०एस०एस०. कलप एवब पल०डबलप० 3 यकगपनद कत बयतन अबदकत करतयत गयत। दवपकलगण दवजय बहतदपर एवब दवनकद कक ओर सप दतरत अधधवकत आपधत दवरद पतसरनतपत अबतगरत धतरत 173(4) बल०एन०एस०एस० दतधखल कर पररवतद पत कत दवरकध कर पररवतद पत कक दनरसत दकयप जतनप कक पतसरनत कक गयल। कप अनतगरत पल०डबलप० 1 पलदडतत, 7 कक शतम कक

22.09.2024 पररवतद मम कधसत तथयल कप अनपसतर दवपकलगण दवनकद और दवजय बहतदपर नप पररवतददनल कक बजप बलततकतर दकयत। घटनत ससल नतबतधलग पपतल कप सतस ददनतबक एक सतवरधजनक खपलत ससतन बततयत गयत हह। घटनत मम पलदडतत कक ककई चकट आनप यत पलदडतत कत कक बततयल 22.09.2024 उपचतर करतयप जतनप कत भल ककई कसन नहह दकयत गयत हह। घटनत ददनतबक गयल हह , कक जतनत बततयत गयत हह। पररवतददनल गनदल तरह सप बतत कक तसत दतरत कसन दकयत गयत हह दक सतनप जतनप पर पपधलस नप दबतव बनतयत कक उनकक ररपकटर नहह धलखल पपधलस अधलकक कक पतसरनतपत पपदरत दकयत गयत हह। उक पररसससदतयल मम पररवतद मम कधसत घटनत दवशवसनलय पतलत नहह हकतल हह। परनतप पररवतददनल नप लगभग दस ददन बतद ददनतबक परनतप पररवतददनल दतरत सतनप पर ददनतबक

05.10.2024

24.09.2024 , , कप सतस गतलल गलचज कर जतन सप मतरनप कक धमकक दल सल, पततवलल पर सबलग सतनत बपनलगबज कक आखयत कप अनपसतर पररवतददनल कप पदत व पपत नप दवपकलगण 1 व 2 धजसकप समबबध मम दवपकल दवजय पबजलकक त करतयत बहतदपर नप पररवतददनल कप पदत कलप व पपत मकनप कप गयत हह तसत पररवतद मम कधसत बलततकतर कप तथय कक पपदष नहह हहई हह। उक मप०अ०सब० कक एफ०आई०आर० कक पदत सबलग हह। दवरद मप०अ०सब० 462/2024 1 व 2 कक ओर सप दतधखल आपधत कप अनपसतर दवपकलगण दवपकलगण पररवतर सप जमलनल दववतद चल रहत हह हह , दववतद तसत रबधजश कप कतरण तथयल कक बढत- धजनसप समबबधधत पपत आपधत कप सतस सबलग हह। , कत पररवतददनल कप धजस कतरण उभय पक कप मधय दवधधक कतयरवतदहयतग चल रहल ऐसत पतलत हकतत हह दक उभय पक कप मधय चढत कर पररवतद पसतपत दकयत गयत हह। 1 व 2 दवधध वयवससत महससर पपपसल फप डस धलदमटपड और अनय बनतम दवशपर नयतदयक मधजसटट पट व अनय 1998 (36) ए.सल.सल. मम मतननलय उचचतम नयतयतलय दतरत यह अवधतररत दकयत गयत हह दक आपरतधधक मतमलल मम अदभयपक कक तलबल एक गमभलर दवरय हह। पररवतदल पररवतद मम कधसत आरकपल कप समसरन मम दक सतदकयल कक पसतपत करकप आपरतधधक दवधध कक पचलन मम नहह लत सकतत हह। पपज 20 अतत उपरकक दववपचन कप आधतर पर दवपकलगण कप दवरद कतयरवतहल दकयत जतनत नयतयकदचत पतलत नहह हकतत हह तसत पररवतद दनरसत दकयप जतनप यकगय हह। आदपश पररवतद सब० 391/2024 दनयमतनपसतर दतधखल दफतर हक।" रतजरतनल बनतम दवनकद आदद दनरसत दकयत जततत हह। पततवलल

5. Impeaching the impugned order dated 20.05.2025, learned counsel for the applicant stated that the statement of victim is as good as that of injured witness and taking note of the same, complaint case/application preferred by the applicant ought not to have been rejected by the court concerned vide impugned order dated 20.05.2025. As such, indulgence/interference of this Court is required in the matter.

6. On the contrary, Sri Srivastava, learned AGA says that it appears from the record that with oblique motive, the allegations have been levelled against the private opposite parties. As such, no indulgence/interference of this Court is required in the matter.

7. Considered the aforesaid and perused the record.

8. Upon due consideration of the aforesaid, this Court finds that no indulgence/interference of this Court is required in the impugned order dated 20.05.2025, as to the view of this Court, the application under Section 173(4) B.N.S.S. was filed with oblique motive, which could be to get settled the pending cases and the same can be inferred from the following fact(s)/reason(s):- (i) Admitted position is that a case in terms of Section 133 Cr.P.C. is pending before the Magistrate concerned. (ii) The FIR No. 0462/2024, detailed above, was lodged by one of the accused namely Vijay Bahadur (opposite party No. 3 herein) prior to the aforesaid complaint, in which, allegations against the private opposite parties, named above, related to committing rape with the daughter of the applicant have been levelled by the applicant and supported by the victim. (iii) A complaint case instituted by Sushila w/o Vinod (opposite party No. 2 herein) is pending and in the same, Monu Singh and Kallu Singh (son and husband, respectively, of the applicant) are the opposite parties, as appears from paragraph 3 of the objection (Annexure No. 6 to the instant application). (iv) An application, after thought, was sent to Superintendent of Police on 05.10.2024 i.e. after about 13 days from the date of incident i.e. 22.09.2024. (v) Medical evidence was not filed before the court concerned nor the same has been filed before this Court so as to support the allegations of committing rape.

9. For the foregoing reasons, the instant application is dismissed. Cost made easy. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Arun/- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

2. Heard Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant/Smt. Rajrani and Sri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned AGA for the State of U.P. as well as perused the record.

3. The instant application has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 20.05.2025 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act) Hardoi in complaint case no. 391/2024, Police Station Beniganj, District Hardoi, contained in Annexure no. 1 to this application."

4. Brief facts for the case in hand, which are relevant for the purposes of deciding the instant application, are as under:- (i) An FIR was lodged on 27.09.2024 at about 19:05 hours by the Vijay Bahadur (opposite party No. 3 herein) s/o Veerendra R/o Purwa Baajirao, Police Station- Beniganj, District- Hardoi registered as FIR No. 0462/2024, under Sections- 351(2) B.N.S., akin to Section 506 IPC, and Section 352 B.N.S., akin to 504 IPC, Police Station- Beniganj, District- Hardoi. (ii) As per the aforesaid FIR, accused Kallu Singh s/o Ramjivan Singh, husband of the applicant/Smt. Rajrani, and Monu Singh s/o Kallu Singh R/o Village- Nibaha, Post- Jarauva, Police Station- Beniganj, District- Hardoi hurled abuses and also threatened the opposite party No. 3 for life. (iii) After the aforesaid FIR, an application case was preferred by the applicant/Smt. Rajrani w/o Kallu, an accused of FIR No. 0462/2024, detailed above, making allegations therein against the private opposite parties to attract the offence as indicated under Section 376-D IPC. As per this application, the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 namely Vinod and Vijay Bahadur committed rape with the minor daughter of the applicant on 22.09.2024 at about 7.00 P.M. in an open area i.e. agricultural field. (iv) As the FIR in regard to the incident dated 22.09.2024 was not lodged, the applicant preferred an application/complaint in terms of Section 173(4) B.N.S.S., akin to Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., before the competent court of jurisdiction. The Special Judge (POCSO Act), Hardoi (in short "court concerned") treated the said application as complaint case. (v) After the aforesaid, the statements of victim, victim's mother and victim's father were recorded. (vi) As per the statement of victim recorded before the court concerned, opposite party No. 2/Vinod s/o Kalicharan and opposite party No. 3/Vijay Bahadur s/o Veerendra, informant of FIR No. 0462/2024, detailed above, in intoxicating condition committed rape with victim in an agricultural field. (vii) Other witnesses also supported the story of the prosecution. (viii) It would be apt to indicate here that in the aforesaid case, the private opposite parties, named above, filed an objection (Annexure No. 6 to the instant application) and according to the same, with oblique motive, allegations of committing rape have been levelled against the objectors. (ix) According to the aforesaid objection, on account of encroachment of road, the proceedings in terms of Section 133 Cr.P.C. are pending before the Magistrate concerned. In this regard, documentary evidence was placed on record, however, before this Court, learned counsel for the applicant has not placed the same, though, it ought to have been done. (x) From the aforesaid objection (Annexure No. 6 to the instant application) particularly paragraph 3 of the same, it is also evident that with regard to an incident of 18.06.2024, a complaint case instituted by Sushila w/o Vinod (opposite party No. 2 herein) is pending. (xi) Thereafter, after considering the material available on record, the court concerned rejected the aforesaid complaint case registered as Case No. 391/2024 (Rajrani vs. Vinod and others) vide impugned order dated 20.05.2025, which reads as under:- " पततवलल पपश हहई। पपकतर पर पररवतददनल कप अधधवकत कक तलबल कप दबनदप पर सपनत गयत तसत पततवलल कत अवलककन दकयत गयत। दवदतन अधधवकत उपसससत। पररवतददनल कप दवदतन उपदनरलकक कप ररतपश चचहतन, बजप पतधसरनल कक पपतल उम 15 इस पकतर हह दक पतधसरनल / ' दवपकल सब० 3 दवजय बहतदपर, पररवतद सप समबबधधत तथय सबकपप मम पररवतददनल रतजरतनल कप दतरत दवपकल सब० 1 दवनकद, दवपकल सब० 2 पभतरल दनरलकक सतनत बपनलगबज एवब दवपकल सब० 4 दवरद एक पतसरनतपत अनतगरत धतरत 173(4) बल०एन०एस०एस० मय शपसपत इस आशय कत पसतपत दकयत गयत दक ददनतबक 22.09.2024 कक शतम 7 वरर शचच गई सल दक रतसतप मम गतगव कप दवनकद पपत कतललचरन व दवजय बहतदपर पपत वलरपनद शरतब कप नशप मम पतधसरनल कक पपतल कक पकड धलयत और मप गह दबत कर खपत मम लप जतकर बलततकतर दकयत। पतधसरनल कक कक पपतल कतफक डरल हहई घर पहह बचल। घर वतलल कप पपछनप पर डर कक वजह सप कप छ न बतत सकक। अगलप ददन घर वतलल कप पपछनप पर पतधसरनल कक पपतल नप पपरल घटनत पतधसरनल व पररवतर वतलल कक बततई। ददनतबक 24.09.2024 कक पतधसरनल दतरत सतनत बपनलगबज मम पतसरनतपत ददयत, परनतप पपधलस दतरत सपबह सप शतम तक पतधसरनल व पतधसरनल कक पपतल कक सतनप मम दबठतयप रखत तसत पतधसरनल कक पपतल कक कमरप मम जतकर बपरल तरह दबतव बनतयत गयत। गनदल तरह सप बतत कक गई। शतम कक पतधसरनल व पतधसरनल कक पपतल कक कहत गयत दक रकज 10 ददनल तक तपमहम सतनप पर बपलतयमगप, परनतप पपधलस दतरत पतधसरनल कप पदत कक सतनप पर आनप कत दबतव बनतयत गयत, ततदक दबतव बनतकर मतमलप कक रफत दफत दकयत जत सकप , परनतप पपधलस दतरत ररपकटर दजर नहह कक गयल। उक पतसरनतपत पर समबबधधत सतनप सप आखयत आहहत कक गयल जक सबलग पततवलल हह। नयतयतलय कप आदपश ददनतबदकत 12.11.2024 कप दतरत उक पतसरनतपत पररवतद कप रप मम पबजलकक त दकयत गयत। पररवतद कप समसरन मम पररवतददनल कप बयतन अनतगरत धतरत 223 बल०एन० एस०एस० अबदकत पल०डबलप० 2 करतयत गयत तसत धतरत 225 बल०एन०एस०एस०. कलप एवब पल०डबलप० 3 यकगपनद कत बयतन अबदकत करतयत गयत। दवपकलगण दवजय बहतदपर एवब दवनकद कक ओर सप दतरत अधधवकत आपधत दवरद पतसरनतपत अबतगरत धतरत 173(4) बल०एन०एस०एस० दतधखल कर पररवतद पत कत दवरकध कर पररवतद पत कक दनरसत दकयप जतनप कक पतसरनत कक गयल। कप अनतगरत पल०डबलप० 1 पलदडतत, 7 कक शतम कक

22.09.2024 पररवतद मम कधसत तथयल कप अनपसतर दवपकलगण दवनकद और दवजय बहतदपर नप पररवतददनल कक बजप बलततकतर दकयत। घटनत ससल नतबतधलग पपतल कप सतस ददनतबक एक सतवरधजनक खपलत ससतन बततयत गयत हह। घटनत मम पलदडतत कक ककई चकट आनप यत पलदडतत कत कक बततयल 22.09.2024 उपचतर करतयप जतनप कत भल ककई कसन नहह दकयत गयत हह। घटनत ददनतबक गयल हह , कक जतनत बततयत गयत हह। पररवतददनल गनदल तरह सप बतत कक तसत दतरत कसन दकयत गयत हह दक सतनप जतनप पर पपधलस नप दबतव बनतयत कक उनकक ररपकटर नहह धलखल पपधलस अधलकक कक पतसरनतपत पपदरत दकयत गयत हह। उक पररसससदतयल मम पररवतद मम कधसत घटनत दवशवसनलय पतलत नहह हकतल हह। परनतप पररवतददनल नप लगभग दस ददन बतद ददनतबक परनतप पररवतददनल दतरत सतनप पर ददनतबक

05.10.2024

24.09.2024 , , कप सतस गतलल गलचज कर जतन सप मतरनप कक धमकक दल सल, पततवलल पर सबलग सतनत बपनलगबज कक आखयत कप अनपसतर पररवतददनल कप पदत व पपत नप दवपकलगण 1 व 2 धजसकप समबबध मम दवपकल दवजय पबजलकक त करतयत बहतदपर नप पररवतददनल कप पदत कलप व पपत मकनप कप गयत हह तसत पररवतद मम कधसत बलततकतर कप तथय कक पपदष नहह हहई हह। उक मप०अ०सब० कक एफ०आई०आर० कक पदत सबलग हह। दवरद मप०अ०सब० 462/2024 1 व 2 कक ओर सप दतधखल आपधत कप अनपसतर दवपकलगण दवपकलगण पररवतर सप जमलनल दववतद चल रहत हह हह , दववतद तसत रबधजश कप कतरण तथयल कक बढत- धजनसप समबबधधत पपत आपधत कप सतस सबलग हह। , कत पररवतददनल कप धजस कतरण उभय पक कप मधय दवधधक कतयरवतदहयतग चल रहल ऐसत पतलत हकतत हह दक उभय पक कप मधय चढत कर पररवतद पसतपत दकयत गयत हह। 1 व 2 दवधध वयवससत महससर पपपसल फप डस धलदमटपड और अनय बनतम दवशपर नयतदयक मधजसटट पट व अनय 1998 (36) ए.सल.सल. मम मतननलय उचचतम नयतयतलय दतरत यह अवधतररत दकयत गयत हह दक आपरतधधक मतमलल मम अदभयपक कक तलबल एक गमभलर दवरय हह। पररवतदल पररवतद मम कधसत आरकपल कप समसरन मम दक सतदकयल कक पसतपत करकप आपरतधधक दवधध कक पचलन मम नहह लत सकतत हह। पपज 20 अतत उपरकक दववपचन कप आधतर पर दवपकलगण कप दवरद कतयरवतहल दकयत जतनत नयतयकदचत पतलत नहह हकतत हह तसत पररवतद दनरसत दकयप जतनप यकगय हह। आदपश पररवतद सब० 391/2024 दनयमतनपसतर दतधखल दफतर हक।" रतजरतनल बनतम दवनकद आदद दनरसत दकयत जततत हह। पततवलल

5. Impeaching the impugned order dated 20.05.2025, learned counsel for the applicant stated that the statement of victim is as good as that of injured witness and taking note of the same, complaint case/application preferred by the applicant ought not to have been rejected by the court concerned vide impugned order dated 20.05.2025. As such, indulgence/interference of this Court is required in the matter.

6. On the contrary, Sri Srivastava, learned AGA says that it appears from the record that with oblique motive, the allegations have been levelled against the private opposite parties. As such, no indulgence/interference of this Court is required in the matter.

7. Considered the aforesaid and perused the record.

8. Upon due consideration of the aforesaid, this Court finds that no indulgence/interference of this Court is required in the impugned order dated 20.05.2025, as to the view of this Court, the application under Section 173(4) B.N.S.S. was filed with oblique motive, which could be to get settled the pending cases and the same can be inferred from the following fact(s)/reason(s):- (i) Admitted position is that a case in terms of Section 133 Cr.P.C. is pending before the Magistrate concerned. (ii) The FIR No. 0462/2024, detailed above, was lodged by one of the accused namely Vijay Bahadur (opposite party No. 3 herein) prior to the aforesaid complaint, in which, allegations against the private opposite parties, named above, related to committing rape with the daughter of the applicant have been levelled by the applicant and supported by the victim. (iii) A complaint case instituted by Sushila w/o Vinod (opposite party No. 2 herein) is pending and in the same, Monu Singh and Kallu Singh (son and husband, respectively, of the applicant) are the opposite parties, as appears from paragraph 3 of the objection (Annexure No. 6 to the instant application). (iv) An application, after thought, was sent to Superintendent of Police on 05.10.2024 i.e. after about 13 days from the date of incident i.e. 22.09.2024. (v) Medical evidence was not filed before the court concerned nor the same has been filed before this Court so as to support the allegations of committing rape.

9. For the foregoing reasons, the instant application is dismissed. Cost made easy. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Arun/- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench