Mohd Niyaz v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 504, 506
- Constitution of India art. 21
Judgment
Operative part
Applicant :- Mohd Niyaz Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Murtaza Hasan, Abdul Malik, Anshuman Srivastava, Sadiya Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The instant application has been preferred for the following main relief:- "To direct the learned court no. 20 Civil Judge, (SD). Lucknow to decide the criminal case no. 7897 of 2017 (State of U.P. versus raj and others) arising out of crime no. 486 of 2016 lodged under section 323, 504, 506 IPC at police station Kakori, Lucknow do decide the case expeditiously. " Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously, as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to speedy trial/disposal of the case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of. Order Date :- 28.7.2025 Vinay/- VINAY KUMAR VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 504, 506; Constitution of India — art. 21.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 28 Jul 2025.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.