Bhishm Singh v. U.P. State Information Commission Thru. Its State
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Heard Shri Vishnu Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Shikhar Anand, learned counsel for the opposite parties. We have perused the impugned order as also the interlocutory order dated 22.10.2024 passed in proceedings before the U.P. Information Commission and the response of the PIO dated 11.12.2024 by which he as stated, provided all the information. We have also perused Section 9 of the Societies Registration Act, 1960 which contains a provision under which the certified copies of the documents demanded at point 5 of the application under the Right to Information Act can be applied. We see no reason to interfere with the impugned order, as, we do not find any error therein. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. . Order Date :- 30.7.2025 R.K.P. (Jaspreet Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) RAJ KUMAR PATEL RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Registration Act, 1908; Right to Information Act, 2005.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 30 Jul 2025. The bench was RAJAN ROY, JASPREET SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.