✦ Allahabad High Court · 03 Jul 2025

Barkat Ali And 5 Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 2

No. 5404 of 2025PRAKASH SHUKLA3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

The application is allowed, accordingly

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 88. In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise on 26.11.2022 and no grievance remains to be agitated and, as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of…
  • Para 99. Accordingly, entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.1279 of 2014; State vs. Barkat Ali and others, arising out of Case Crime No.148/2014, under Sections 498A, 323 and 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act relating to Police Station- Kandhai, District-Pratapgarh which is pending before…
  • Para 1010. The application is allowed, accordingly. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) Order Date :- 3.7.2025 -Piyush- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Judgment

1.

Vakalatnama filed today by Shri Akash Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of opposite party No.2 and 3 is taken on record.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Akash Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and 3 and perused the record.

3.

By means of the instant application, the applicants have prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.1279 of 2014; State vs. Barkat Ali and others, arising out of Case Crime No.148/2014, under Sections 498A, 323 and 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act relating to Police Station-Kandhai, District-Pratapgarh which is pending before the Civil Judge (J.D.), Room No.15, Pratapgarh.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to certain misunderstanding, the instant F.I.R. was lodged against the applicants. He added that later on, the parties sat together and have amicably settled their disputes, which has been reduced in writing on 26.11.2022. Thereafter, the applicants filed an Application U/S 482 No. 8952 of 2022 wherein this Court has directed the trial court to verify the said compromise deed and in compliance thereof, the compromise deed was verified on 21.12.2023. He submits that now there is no dispute in between the parties and they have settled their dispute. He submits that further criminal proceedings in the instant matter would amount to harassment and, thus, the instant criminal proceedings arising out of Case Crime No. 148/2014 may be quashed.

5.

Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and 3 has also supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the opposite party no.2 and 3 have no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped.

6.

Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the submissions aforesaid.

7.

Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 26.11.2022 and said compromise has been verified on 21.12.2023 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned criminal proceedings relating to Case Crime No.148/2014.

8.

In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise on 26.11.2022 and no grievance remains to be agitated and, as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgments of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2008) 9 SCC 677; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others, (2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466.

9.

Accordingly, entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.1279 of 2014; State vs. Barkat Ali and others, arising out of Case Crime No.148/2014, under Sections 498A, 323 and 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act relating to Police Station- Kandhai, District-Pratapgarh which is pending before the Civil Judge (J.D.), Room No.15, Pratapgarhare hereby quashed.

Operative part

10.

The application is allowed, accordingly. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) Order Date :- 3.7.2025 -Piyush- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is allowed, accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 498A, 506.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 03 Jul 2025. The bench was PRAKASH SHUKLA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 5404 of 2025). ← Search more judgments