✦ Allahabad High Court · 12 Aug 2025

Pradeep Kumar v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

No. 6443 of 2024SHREE PRAKASH SINGH3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

The application is allowed accordingly

Judgment

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Chandra Rastogi, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the material placed on record. By means of instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant has prayed for quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 27819 of 2017; State Vs. Pradeep Kumar, arising out of Case Crime No. 192 of 2016, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Malihabad, District Lucknow as well as summoning order dated 21.07.2017 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (custom), Lucknow. Learned counsel for the applicant has placed before this Court a judgment and order of the trial court dated 20.12.2024 passed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in Original Suit No. 4444 of 2024, whereby the matter is decreed in favour of the parties.

He further submits that the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court vide order of this Court dated 23.07.2024, whereupon the parties appeared before the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court and have settled their dispute and arrived at a settlement/agreement dated 16th of December, 2024 and now there is no dispute in between the parties. He submits that since the matter is settled, therefore, the criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 27819 of 2017, arising out of Case Crime No. 192 of 2016 may be quashed. Learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 2 has also supported the version of learned counsel for the applicant and submits that parties have amicably settled their dispute and opposite party no. 2 has no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicant may be dropped. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submissions aforesaid.

Operative part

Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, it transpires that the matter was referred to the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court by this Court vide order dated 23.07.2024 and now the matter is settled and the Mediators' report dated 16th of December, 2024 is appended alongwith the settlement/agreement in between the parties with remark that the mediation completed and succeeded. From perusal of the settlement/agreement, it transpires that the parties are agreed that they will withdraw all their cases lodged against each other, as is averred in Paragraph-H of the settlement/agreement. This Court has noticed that the parties have settled their dispute before the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court and, therefore, the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 27819 of 2017; State Vs. Pradeep Kumar, arising out of Case Crime No. 192 of 2016, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Malihabad, District Lucknow, are hereby quashed. The settlement/agreement shall be the part of this order. Consequences to be followed. The application is allowed accordingly. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 kkv/ KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is allowed accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 498A, 504, 506; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — ss. 3, 4; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 12 Aug 2025. The bench was SHREE PRAKASH SINGH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 6443 of 2024). ← Search more judgments