✦ Allahabad High Court · 02 Jul 2025

Ram Dulare & Anr. v. Civil Judge Senior Division Court No. 41 Lko

WRIT - C No. 6149 of 2025RAJAN ROY, PRAKASH SHUKLA

Case at a glance

Decided
02 Jul 2025
Bench
RAJAN ROY, PRAKASH SHUKLA
Neutral citation
2025:AHC-LKO:37096-DB

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 2.7.2025 -Piyush- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Judgment

2.

A civil suit of the petitioner is pending against the private opposite parties wherein, as claimed, a temporary injunction order dated 09.02.2022 is operative. In spite of it and in violation of it, as alleged, the private opposite parties, who are said to be defendants in the suit have undertaken some construction on account of which, the petitioner filed an application under Section 151 C.P.C., however, neither the order sheet of the suit has been annexed nor the complete plaint has been annexed with this writ petition to enable us to ascertain as to whether the private opposite parties are defendants in the said suit. In any case, as the suit is pending, the petitioner can avail remedies prescribed before the court below where the suit proceedings are pending or seek such other remedies as may be permissible in law. We see no reason to entertain this petition for the relief prayed.

3.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 2.7.2025 -Piyush- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 02 Jul 2025. The bench was RAJAN ROY, PRAKASH SHUKLA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WRIT - C No. 6149 of 2025). ← Search more judgments