Smt. Alka Saxena And 2 Others v. District Judge (Presiding Officer) Motor
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 166
Judgment
Petitioner :- Smt. Alka Saxena And 2 Others Respondent :- District Judge (Presiding Officer) Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, North, Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Agrawal, Shivansh Agrawal Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.
The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "1. To issue an order, or direction in the exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction, directing the District Judge (Presiding Office), Motor Accident and Claims Tribunal, North, Lucknow i.e. the Respondent no. 1 to adjudicate and decide the Claim Petition filed under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 pending before it in Claim Petition No. 256 of 2020 (Titled as: Smt. Alka Saxena & Others. v. Mohd. Anees & Ors.) in a time bound manner, as expeditiously as possible; "
Considering the relief as sought, the present petition is disposed off directing the Tribunal to consider and decide the abovesaid claim petition in accordance with law with all expedition preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 akverma ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 166.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 30 May 2025.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.