Karan Pal v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The appeal is disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case appellant Karan Pal appears before the trial court within 14 days from today and applies for bail, the…
- Para 55. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 23.4.2025 RKM. RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Judgment
The present appeal under Section 14 A (1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment Act, 2015) has been filed against the order dated 28.10.2020 passed by Special Sessions Judge, S.C./S.T (P.A.) Act, Lucknow under Sections, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1) (R), (S) of the Act of 1989 relating to police station Ashiyana, District Lucknow.
Learned counsel for appellant, after arguing for some time, submits that present appeal may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021", to which learned A.G.A. has no objection.
In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case appellant Karan Pal appears before the trial court within 14 days from today and applies for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra).
Operative part
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 23.4.2025 RKM. RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989; Amendment Act, 2015; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 23 Apr 2025. The bench was ALOK MATHUR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.