Prabhujot Singh And 3 Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 452, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Learned counsel for applicants, after arguing the matter at some length, submits that grievance of applicants shall be substantially redressed in case applicants are granted liberty to file bail application(s) before the Court concerned, which may be decided in view of law laid down…
- Para 55. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceedings as well as summoning order is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the applicants appear before the trial Court within three weeks from today and…
- Para 66. The application is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Judgment
Heard Sri Alok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for applicants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State.
The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Criminal Complaint Case No. 104 of 2024, under Sections 323, 452, 506 IPC, Police Station - Mailani, District - Lakhimpur Kheri pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ist, Kheri as well as to quash the summoning order dated 25.07.2024 issued against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
Learned counsel for applicants, after arguing the matter at some length, submits that grievance of applicants shall be substantially redressed in case applicants are granted liberty to file bail application(s) before the Court concerned, which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021".
Learned A.G.A. has no objection in case suitable directions are issued to the Court concerned to consider and decide the applicants application(s) for bail in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceedings as well as summoning order is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the applicants appear before the trial Court within three weeks from today and apply for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra).
The application is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 452, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 28 Apr 2025. The bench was ALOK MATHUR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.