Subhash Chandra Pandey v. U.P. Forest Corp. Thru. Managing Director
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Heard Sri Shrawan Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite parties. By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief : "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/ directing the opposite party No. 1 to make payment of Gratuity amount of Rs. 2,85,525/- alongwith 12 % interest calculating the services of the petitioner as daily wagers rendered by him from 01.11.1981 upto 06.01.1990 from due date till actual payment made to the petitioner according to the payment of Gratuity Act 1972." Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that ends of justice would suffice if he is allowed to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 1 and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time. With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage. Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within 15 days before the opposite party no.1 i.e. the Managing Director, Aranya Vikas Bhawan, Indira Nagar, Lucknow taking all his pleas and grounds and enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the opposite party concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of one month from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. The decision on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. Writ petition is finally disposed of. . (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Order Date :- 10.4.2025 dk/ DEVENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Gratuity Act, 1972.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 10 Apr 2025. The bench was RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.