Rajkumar Dubey v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Considering the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and also the observations made by this Court in the case of Shivam Gupta @ Shubham @ Lavi vs. State of U.P. through…
Judgment
"Wherefore, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the learned trial Court of District Sultanpur to accept the personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned in one case, and the same shall be considered by the Court concerned as sureties and bonds in other cases for the purpose of releasing the applicant on bail in the interest of justice. "
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in two cases. He has next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court concerned, the details of are as under : (i) Case Crime No. 121 of 2022 under Section 380 IPC, P.S. Kamrauli, District Sultanpur in which the bail was granted on 26.3.2025 by Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Court No. 4, Sultanpur with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each and a personal bond of the same amount. (ii) Case Crime No. 122 of 2022 under Section 380 IPC, P.S. Kamrauli, District Sultanpur in which the bail was granted on 26.3.2025 by Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Court No. 4, Sultanpur with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each and a personal bond of the same amount.
He has further submitted that the applicant is a very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders.
Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P.
Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter afÏdavit.
Considering the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and also the observations made by this Court in the case of Shivam Gupta @ Shubham @ Lavi vs. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Civil Sectt. Lko (Application U/S 482 No.466 of 2024) as well as in Dr. Abhishek Yadav vs. State of U.P. (Application U/S 482 No.18948 of 2023), the present application is allowed with a direction that in case the applicant provides the personal bond and two sureties mentioned in the following one of the two bail orders dated 26.3.2025 i.e. (i) Case Crime No. 121 of 2022 under Section 380 IPC, P.S. Kamrauli, District Sultanpur (two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each and a personal bond of the same amount) then the same shall be held good in rest of the cases registered against the applicant, as mentioned above, and the applicant shall be released on bail on that sureties. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 AKK AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 380.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 28 Apr 2025. The bench was MANISH KUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.