High Court · 2025
Case Details
13. The learned counsel for the informant has submitted that there are numerous photographs taken from the CCTV cameras installed at toll plazas showing some vehicles passing through the toll plazas but he admitted that in none of the photographs, the informant or the applicant can be identified.
14. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the allegation is of commission of rape by eight persons but no injury was visible on her private parts and she declined internal examination for ascertainment of any injury and the allegation is not supported by pathological examination report; there is a long chain of incidents leading to lodging of F.I.R.s at the behest of the informant as also against her containing allegations of commission of misdeeds, including sexual offences and that the investigation already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.
15. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
16. Let the applicant-Ranjeet Yadav be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. . Order Date :- 4.4.2025 -Amit K- [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
13. The learned counsel for the informant has submitted that there are numerous photographs taken from the CCTV cameras installed at toll plazas showing some vehicles passing through the toll plazas but he admitted that in none of the photographs, the informant or the applicant can be identified.
14. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the allegation is of commission of rape by eight persons but no injury was visible on her private parts and she declined internal examination for ascertainment of any injury and the allegation is not supported by pathological examination report; there is a long chain of incidents leading to lodging of F.I.R.s at the behest of the informant as also against her containing allegations of commission of misdeeds, including sexual offences and that the investigation already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.
15. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
16. Let the applicant-Ranjeet Yadav be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. . Order Date :- 4.4.2025 -Amit K- [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench