Guddu v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 39 rr. 1, 2
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Considering the reliefs as prayed for, the present petition is disposed of directing the Court concerned to decide the aforesaid application with all expedition, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of a certified copy of this order, in…
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The present petition has been filed with the following main relief: "A. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the Application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Regular Suit No. 643 of 2025 in re Guddu versus Rakesh Kumar & others, within such stipulated time as this Hon'ble Court may prescribe; "
Considering the reliefs as prayed for, the present petition is disposed of directing the Court concerned to decide the aforesaid application with all expedition, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of a certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. Order Date :- 1.4.2025 Ashutosh ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 39 rr. 1, 2.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 01 Apr 2025. The bench was PANKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.