✦ Allahabad High Court · 13 Feb 2025

Rajesh Kumar v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue

WRIT - C No. 1440 of 2025RAJAN ROY, PRAKASH SHUKLA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

the instant writ petition is disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Against the said grievance, remedy is not a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may avail other remedy, if there is a cause. With these observations, the instant writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 13.2.2025 A.Nigam ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: the instant writ petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 13 Feb 2025. The bench was RAJAN ROY, PRAKASH SHUKLA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WRIT - C No. 1440 of 2025). ← Search more judgments