Nayab Singh v. The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 419, 420, 467, 468, 471
- Constitution of India art. 21
Judgment
Operative part
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The instant application has been preferred for the following main relief:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the opposite party no.2/C.J.M,Bahraich, to decide the case no. 9850/2024 (State vs Genda Singh etc.) case crime no. 268/ 2023, under section 419, 420, 467,468 and 471 I.P.C. at police station Payagpur, District - Bahraich, expeditiously, in the interest of justice. " Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously, as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to speedy trial/disposal of the case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 Arun/- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 419, 420, 467, 468, 471; Constitution of India — art. 21.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 13 Feb 2025. The bench was SAURABH LAVANIA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.