Wanish Khan And 2 Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
Judgment
At the very outset, learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the present case as the applicant has a remedy to file a criminal writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the FIR in place of filing the same under Section 482 Cr.P.C. In view of the aforesaid, the present case is hereby dismissed as not maintainable as the applicant has a remedy to file a criminal writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of FIR. Order Date :- 14.5.2025 Ashish ASHISH MISHRA ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 14 May 2025. The bench was MANISH KUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.