Kiran Mishra v. Karuna Shanker Rastogi
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PANKAJ BHATIA
Outcome
Allowed
the applicant, the present application is allowed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the aforesaid and considering the inconvenience being faced by the applicant, the present application is allowed. The proceedings pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Pratapgarh are transferred to the equivalent court at District Allahabad/Prayagraj. August 27, 2025 Praveen…
Judgment
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant. No one is present for the opposite party.
The present application under Section 24 of C.P.C. has been preferred by the applicant for transfer the proceedings of Case No. 1047 of 2024 (Vibhuti Narain Tripathi vs. Kiran Mishra) under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act from the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Pratapgarh to the equivalent court at District Allahabad/Prayagraj.
When the matter was taken up by this Court on 20.08.2025, a request was made on behalf of the respondent that they wanted to withdraw the proceedings of Case No. 1047 of 2024, which was permitted by this Court to be done within a week.
It is stated that no application has been filed seeking withdrawal of Case No. 1047 of 2024 despite making statement before this Court.
Operative part
In view of the aforesaid and considering the inconvenience being faced by the applicant, the present application is allowed. The proceedings pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Pratapgarh are transferred to the equivalent court at District Allahabad/Prayagraj. August 27, 2025 Praveen (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the applicant, the present application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 24; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s. 13.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.