High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
recorded by the trial court. Wherein the informant stated that he had not witnessed the incident and the police had informed him that the applicant and Deepak had shot at his son.
11. Another supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant annexing therewith the relevant extract of case diary which shows that the applicant has been made an accused on the basis of information given by a mukhbir.
12. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that there is no witness of the incident and the applicant has been implicated solely on the basis of information received from a mukhbir; that statement of the informant has already been recorded by the trial court and he has also stated that the police had informed him about involvement of the applicant in commission of the offence; that there is no eye witness of the incident and statement of the informant has already been recorded and in case of release of the applicant on bail, the applicant will not be in a position to influence the witnesses, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.
13. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
14. Let the applicant-Ambuj Yadav be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. . Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Pradeep/- [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
recorded by the trial court. Wherein the informant stated that he had not witnessed the incident and the police had informed him that the applicant and Deepak had shot at his son.
11. Another supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant annexing therewith the relevant extract of case diary which shows that the applicant has been made an accused on the basis of information given by a mukhbir.
12. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that there is no witness of the incident and the applicant has been implicated solely on the basis of information received from a mukhbir; that statement of the informant has already been recorded by the trial court and he has also stated that the police had informed him about involvement of the applicant in commission of the offence; that there is no eye witness of the incident and statement of the informant has already been recorded and in case of release of the applicant on bail, the applicant will not be in a position to influence the witnesses, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.
13. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
14. Let the applicant-Ambuj Yadav be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. . Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Pradeep/- [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench